Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix #88: Improve type coverage #210

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

Manu1400
Copy link

Summary

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

  • Bugfix
  • Feature
  • Code style update
  • Refactor
  • Docs
  • Build-related changes
  • Other, please describe:

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

  • Yes
  • No

If yes, please describe the impact and migration path for existing applications:

The PR fulfills these requirements:

  • When resolving a specific issue, it's referenced in the PR's title (e.g. fix #xxx[,#xxx], where "xxx" is the issue number)

You have tested in the following browsers: (Providing a detailed version will be better.)

  • Chrome
  • Firefox
  • Safari
  • Edge
  • IE

If adding a new feature, the PR's description includes:

  • A convincing reason for adding this feature
  • Related documents have been updated
  • Related tests have been updated

To avoid wasting your time, it's best to open a feature request issue first and wait for approval before working on it.

Other information:
Add // @ts-check on files

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented May 24, 2019

Deploy preview for saber ready!

Built with commit 695673b

https://deploy-preview-210--saber.netlify.com

@krmax44
Copy link
Contributor

krmax44 commented May 27, 2019

As this repo uses yarn for package management, the package-lock.json files should probably be replaced with yarn lock files.

@krmax44 krmax44 requested a review from egoist May 30, 2019 16:57
@egoist
Copy link
Collaborator

egoist commented Nov 2, 2019

I decided to rewrite it in TS entirely (#536), thanks for the help anyways.

@egoist egoist closed this Nov 2, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants