-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 57
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
PopSugar.* - Required user action blocked (Fanboy's Annoyance List + Fanboy's Cookie List) #512
Comments
From my side only Disconnect / Firefox tracking protection block load GDPR actions:
when I have blank website or request to disable "adblock":
PS. |
I've tested this issue thoroughly, using only Fanboy's Annoyance List and Fanboy's Cookie List. |
Guess that neither the
|
No, when using Fanboy's Annoyance List and/or Fanboy's Cookie List, NOTHING can be accessed @ Example 1: Example 2: To properly test this, make sure that you're ONLY using Fanboy's Annoyance List and/or Fanboy's Cookie List, with a EMPTY browser cache! The ONLY way to fix this (that I'm aware of), is to make exceptions for all of the three cosmetic rules that I've pointed out in my previous posts!! |
I couldn't reproduce it with my lists; here is a video of what I see; |
First of all, I can tell that you're not testing this properly, because you're using additional filters. Also, something strange is indeed going on, because you're getting a completely different cookie consent warning than I am. Anyway, this is what I get, when trying to access As you can see, it stops at this rule: So, after adding the exception Now it stops at these rules:
So, after also adding the exceptions |
I am using Easylist + Easyprivacy here, can you confirm it works fine with Easyprivacy enabled? |
Given uBo defaults have Easyprivacy List enabled, not sure why you disabled it. I have no issues having a 2nd @@||evidon.com/geo/ whitelist, but thats all its needed. (as seen by the video) |
New test, using EasyList + EasyPrivacy + Fanboy's Annoyance List + Fanboy's Cookie List: It still stops at this rule: After adding the exception Again, it stops at these cosmetic rules:
So, the same exceptions are needed! |
How does it differ from my video? |
No, like I said, there are obviously some differences to what you're experiencing from your end, compared to what I am experiencing from my end.
The cosmetic rules alone are enough to block the cookie consent from my end. I don't know if it's related to location differences, or UA sniffing that discriminates certain browsers, but I can say with absolute certainty at this point that all of the three exceptions that I've listed needs to be present!! |
Already whitelisted in the list: Elements shown on popsugar.co.uk: Generic elements used: Decision: Leaving it. |
Well, all I can say is that it's a wrong decision. |
I can tell from your video, that from your end, it doesn't even try to access the essential script that I mentioned in the first post, which is this one!: Oh well, I've wasted enough time on this. :( |
If anyone else is interested in troubleshooting this issue, here's my latest finding: I just gave it a try, using SRWare Iron, which is a Chromium-based browser.. |
Strange bug, I cannot reproduce on the Swedish proxy and the preferred Norwegian language. |
We'll continue this discussion at that other issue report, that I refered to above. |
The issue have been confirmed now, and it seems to be limited to non-EU European countries. Perhaps now, ryanbr, you'll reconsider to include the necessary exceptions in your filters? -- EDIT: |
Affected sites:
(Not sure about the
.com
and.com.au
domains though, since this seems to be a GDPR thing)Issue:
Required user action (cookie consent) is blocked, preventing access to the sites.
Problem filters:
Problem rules:
(Each rule alone is enough to block the cookie consent, so all of them needs to be whitelisted)
Blocked script:
https://c.evidon.com/sitenotice/evidon-banner.js
Possible fix:
--
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: