Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): update dependency protocolbuffers/protobuf-go to v1.34.2 #345

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 18, 2024

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Jun 11, 2024

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Update Change
protocolbuffers/protobuf-go patch v1.34.1 -> v1.34.2

Release Notes

protocolbuffers/protobuf-go (protocolbuffers/protobuf-go)

v1.34.2

Compare Source

Minor feature:

  • CL/589336: gofeatures: allow setting legacy_unmarshal_json_enum feature at file level

Minor bug fixes:

  • CL/588875: types/descriptorpb: regenerate using latest protobuf v27.0 release
  • CL/586396: internal/impl: fix size cache semantics with lazy decoding
  • CL/585736: reflect/protodesc: remove obsolete JSON name check from desc validator
  • CL/588976: reflect/protoreflect: FieldDescriptor.Kind should never be GroupKind for maps or fields of map entry

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

@rvolosatovs rvolosatovs enabled auto-merge (rebase) June 18, 2024 07:16
@rvolosatovs rvolosatovs merged commit cccc5ca into main Jun 18, 2024
1 check passed
@rvolosatovs rvolosatovs deleted the renovate/protocolbuffers-protobuf-go-1.x branch June 18, 2024 07:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant