Update README to use mdbook over rustbook #79
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
r? @steveklabnik (dunno anything about this stuff) |
|
it was ported to mdbook in #62 so yes! LGTM |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Rustbook has been largely re-implemented in terms of mdBook, the rust books have been ported to mdBook, and the README's install instructions are wildly out of date by now.
I'd like to propose changing the build instructions to use mdBook, which appears to be better-maintained, at least because
cargo install mdbookis a little simpler than cloning and building rustbook.The build process is about the same and works just as well as rustbook did.