-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 149
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
perf triage for 2021-07-20. #930
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks great! I just made some comments, but there's no need to spend more time on this.
Replace associated item bound vars with placeholders when projecting [#86993](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/86993) | ||
- Moderate regression in [instruction counts](https://perf.rust-lang.org/compare.html?start=b1f8e27b74c541d3d555149c8efa4bfe9385cd56&end=27e42058811e448b1a7dd8630d86ab247fbfcb9b&stat=instructions:u) (up to 1.5% on `incr-patched: b9b3e592dd cherry picked` builds of `style-servo-debug`) | ||
- A perf run was [done on the PR originally](https://perf.rust-lang.org/compare.html?start=fdfe819580062a441024d713b49340cd3f7d7efc&end=7baa78ec683fd14db4d4c1869dbef5cbbc5b774d). The regression flagged here seems to be on a different set of benchmarks: `style-servo-debug` and `wf-projection-stress-65510-*`, neither of which was flagged as a regression in the original runs. | ||
- Results overall seem pretty mixed and hard to interpret. Left a [comment](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/86993#issuecomment-883624762) on the PR. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure why the triage report labeled this as a regression when the results seem so mixed... I will investigate this.
|
||
Remove special case for `ExprKind::Paren` in `MutVisitor` [#87284](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/87284) | ||
- Moderate regression in [instruction counts](https://perf.rust-lang.org/compare.html?start=014026d1a7ca991f82f12efa95ef4dffb29dc8af&end=6535449a002264ee08dec8e741f1aadd97428fae&stat=instructions:u) (up to 1.0% on `full` builds of `coercions-debug`) | ||
- This is on the borderline for "significant regression", and was the *only* regression associated with this PR. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Eventually I'd like to make the logic for labeling runs as regressions to be a bit smarter in these cases. We should be able to encode that if there is only a single noisy benchmark which regressed and that regression is barely significant, we shouldn't count it as a regression.
…t already got tags added to them.
No description provided.