Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

perf triage for 2021-07-20. #930

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 22, 2021
Merged

Conversation

pnkfelix
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

Copy link
Member

@rylev rylev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great! I just made some comments, but there's no need to spend more time on this.

Replace associated item bound vars with placeholders when projecting [#86993](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/86993)
- Moderate regression in [instruction counts](https://perf.rust-lang.org/compare.html?start=b1f8e27b74c541d3d555149c8efa4bfe9385cd56&end=27e42058811e448b1a7dd8630d86ab247fbfcb9b&stat=instructions:u) (up to 1.5% on `incr-patched: b9b3e592dd cherry picked` builds of `style-servo-debug`)
- A perf run was [done on the PR originally](https://perf.rust-lang.org/compare.html?start=fdfe819580062a441024d713b49340cd3f7d7efc&end=7baa78ec683fd14db4d4c1869dbef5cbbc5b774d). The regression flagged here seems to be on a different set of benchmarks: `style-servo-debug` and `wf-projection-stress-65510-*`, neither of which was flagged as a regression in the original runs.
- Results overall seem pretty mixed and hard to interpret. Left a [comment](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/86993#issuecomment-883624762) on the PR.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not sure why the triage report labeled this as a regression when the results seem so mixed... I will investigate this.


Remove special case for `ExprKind::Paren` in `MutVisitor` [#87284](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/87284)
- Moderate regression in [instruction counts](https://perf.rust-lang.org/compare.html?start=014026d1a7ca991f82f12efa95ef4dffb29dc8af&end=6535449a002264ee08dec8e741f1aadd97428fae&stat=instructions:u) (up to 1.0% on `full` builds of `coercions-debug`)
- This is on the borderline for "significant regression", and was the *only* regression associated with this PR.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Eventually I'd like to make the logic for labeling runs as regressions to be a bit smarter in these cases. We should be able to encode that if there is only a single noisy benchmark which regressed and that regression is barely significant, we shouldn't count it as a regression.

triage/2021-07-20.md Show resolved Hide resolved
triage/2021-07-20.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
triage/2021-07-20.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
triage/2021-07-20.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@pnkfelix pnkfelix merged commit 145c6ee into rust-lang:master Jul 22, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants