Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

rustpkg: Set exit codes properly and make tests take advantage of that #9799

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 12, 2013

Conversation

catamorphism
Copy link
Contributor

r? @metajack When I started writing the rustpkg tests, task failure didn't set the
exit code properly. But bblum's work from July fixed that. Hooray! I
just didn't know about it till now.

So, now rustpkg uses exit codes in a more conventional way, and some of
the tests are simpler.

The bigger issue will be to make task failure propagate the error message.
Right now, rustpkg does most of the work in separate tasks, which means if
a task fails, rustpkg can't distinguish between different types of failure
(see #3408)

@metajack
Copy link
Contributor

This already needs a rebase, but you can r=me when you do that.

When I started writing the rustpkg tests, task failure didn't set the
exit code properly. But bblum's work from July fixed that. Hooray! I
just didn't know about it till now.

So, now rustpkg uses exit codes in a more conventional way, and some of
the tests are simpler.

The bigger issue will be to make task failure propagate the error message.
Right now, rustpkg does most of the work in separate tasks, which means if
a task fails, rustpkg can't distinguish between different types of failure
(see rust-lang#3408)
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 12, 2013
…hism,metajack

r? @metajack When I started writing the rustpkg tests, task failure didn't set the
exit code properly. But bblum's work from July fixed that. Hooray! I
just didn't know about it till now.

So, now rustpkg uses exit codes in a more conventional way, and some of
the tests are simpler.

The bigger issue will be to make task failure propagate the error message.
Right now, rustpkg does most of the work in separate tasks, which means if
a task fails, rustpkg can't distinguish between different types of failure
(see #3408)
@bors bors closed this Oct 12, 2013
@bors bors merged commit 7472bae into rust-lang:master Oct 12, 2013
flip1995 pushed a commit to flip1995/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 21, 2022
Update lint `suspicious_to_owned`

changelog: [`suspicious_to_owned`]: Use explicit type annotation on lint description instead of `matches!`
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants