Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 5 pull requests #97654

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Jun 2, 2022
Merged

Rollup of 5 pull requests #97654

merged 12 commits into from
Jun 2, 2022

Conversation

Dylan-DPC
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

WaffleLapkin and others added 12 commits May 29, 2022 13:11
The change was "Show invisible delimiters (within comments) when pretty
printing". It's useful to show these delimiters, but is a breaking
change for some proc macros.

Fixes rust-lang#97608.
…=Mark-Simulacrum

Be a little nicer with casts when formatting `fn` pointers

This removes a `fn(...) -> ...` -> `usize` -> `*const ()` -> `usize` cast. cc rust-lang#95489.
[RFC 2011] Basic compiler infrastructure

Splitting rust-lang#96496 into smaller pieces as was done in rust-lang#97233. Hope review will be easier.

This PR practically contains no logic and only serves as a building ground for the actual code that will be placed in a posterior step.

* Adds `context.rs` to place the new `assert!` logic. Has a lot of unused elements but all of them are used by the implementation.
* Creates an unstable flag because the feature is not yet complete and also to allow external feedback.
* Creates the necessary `sym` identifiers that are mostly based on the library elements -> https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/library/core/src/asserting.rs
* Modifies `assert.rs` to branch to `context.rs` if the unstable flag is enabled.
* Adds a test to satisfy tidy but the test does nothing in reality.
…ftSpider

Fix JSON reexport ICE

Fixes rust-lang#97432.

The problem was that the ID was conflicting because the reexports have the same one. To fix it, I "extended" it by adding the `Symbol` into it as well.

r? `@notriddle`
…exports, r=Nemo157

Rustdoc anonymous reexports

Fixes rust-lang#97615.

r? `@Nemo157`
Revert rust-lang#96682.

The change was "Show invisible delimiters (within comments) when pretty
printing". It's useful to show these delimiters, but is a breaking
change for some proc macros.

Fixes rust-lang#97608.

r? ``@petrochenkov``
@rustbot rustbot added T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Jun 2, 2022
@Dylan-DPC
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=5

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 2, 2022

📌 Commit 1d71237 has been approved by Dylan-DPC

@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Jun 2, 2022
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 2, 2022

⌛ Testing commit 1d71237 with merge 44e9516...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 2, 2022

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: Dylan-DPC
Pushing 44e9516 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Jun 2, 2022
@bors bors merged commit 44e9516 into rust-lang:master Jun 2, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.63.0 milestone Jun 2, 2022
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (44e9516): comparison url.

Instruction count

  • Primary benchmarks: no relevant changes found
  • Secondary benchmarks: mixed results
mean1 max count2
Regressions 😿
(primary)
N/A N/A 0
Regressions 😿
(secondary)
0.6% 0.6% 1
Improvements 🎉
(primary)
N/A N/A 0
Improvements 🎉
(secondary)
-0.6% -0.8% 8
All 😿🎉 (primary) N/A N/A 0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results
  • Primary benchmarks: mixed results
  • Secondary benchmarks: 🎉 relevant improvement found
mean1 max count2
Regressions 😿
(primary)
3.1% 3.1% 1
Regressions 😿
(secondary)
N/A N/A 0
Improvements 🎉
(primary)
-2.3% -2.3% 1
Improvements 🎉
(secondary)
-2.2% -2.2% 1
All 😿🎉 (primary) 0.4% 3.1% 2

Cycles

Results
  • Primary benchmarks: no relevant changes found
  • Secondary benchmarks: mixed results
mean1 max count2
Regressions 😿
(primary)
N/A N/A 0
Regressions 😿
(secondary)
1.9% 1.9% 1
Improvements 🎉
(primary)
N/A N/A 0
Improvements 🎉
(secondary)
-2.4% -2.5% 2
All 😿🎉 (primary) N/A N/A 0

If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf.

Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this perf run, please indicate this with @rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged along with sufficient written justification. If you cannot justify the regressions please open an issue or create a new PR that fixes the regressions, add a comment linking to the newly created issue or PR, and then add the perf-regression-triaged label to this PR.

@rustbot label: +perf-regression

Footnotes

  1. the arithmetic mean of the percent change 2 3

  2. number of relevant changes 2 3

@rustbot rustbot added the perf-regression Performance regression. label Jun 2, 2022
@rylev
Copy link
Member

rylev commented Jun 7, 2022

The improvements outweigh the regressions (which are pretty small and contained in secondary benchmarks). Given it's in a rollup, it's not worth the effort to investigate.

@rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged

@rustbot rustbot added the perf-regression-triaged The performance regression has been triaged. label Jun 7, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. perf-regression Performance regression. perf-regression-triaged The performance regression has been triaged. rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants