-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rollup of 6 pull requests #96502
Closed
Closed
Rollup of 6 pull requests #96502
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Mutex and Condvar are being replaced by more efficient implementations, which need thread parking themselves (see rust-lang#93740). Therefore use the pthread synchronization primitives directly. Also, avoid allocating because the Parker struct is being placed in an Arc anyways.
…r=jackh726 Ensure that `'_` and GAT yields errors Fixes rust-lang#95305 `@bors` r? `@jackh726`
…=manishearth Add more diagnostic items This just adds a handful diagnostic items I noticed were missing. Would it be worth doing this for all of the remaining types? I'm willing to do it if it'd be helpful.
std: directly use pthread in UNIX parker implementation `Mutex` and `Condvar` are being replaced by more efficient implementations, which need thread parking themselves (see rust-lang#93740). Therefore we should use the `pthread` synchronization primitives directly. Also, we can avoid allocating the mutex and condition variable because the `Parker` struct is being placed in an `Arc` anyways. This basically is just a copy of the current `Mutex` and `Condvar` code, which will however be removed (again, see rust-lang#93740). An alternative implementation could be to use dedicated private `OsMutex` and `OsCondvar` types, but all the other platforms supported by std actually have their own thread parking primitives. I used `Pin` to guarantee a stable address for the `Parker` struct, while the current implementation does not, rather using extra unsafe declaration. Since the thread struct is shared anyways, I assumed this would not add too much clutter while being clearer.
…davidtwco Migrate ambiguous plus diagnostic to the new derive macro r? ``@davidtwco`` ``@jyn514``
…-lifetime-suggestion, r=jackh726 Recover suggestions to introduce named lifetime under NLL Fixes rust-lang#96157 r? `@jackh726` Built on top of rust-lang#96385 so only the second commit is relevant
Fixed grammatical error in example comment Added missing "we" in sentence.
rustbot
added
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
T-libs
Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
labels
Apr 28, 2022
@bors r+ rollup=never p=5 |
📌 Commit 439d24e has been approved by |
bors
added
the
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
label
Apr 28, 2022
⌛ Testing commit 439d24e with merge 37abde90a3c9db188b070e7f3e38741bccbbb167... |
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
and removed
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
labels
Apr 28, 2022
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
|
Caused by #96393 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
T-libs
Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
'_
and GAT yields errors #95312 (Ensure that'_
and GAT yields errors)Failed merges:
r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup