Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make it possible to run cargo test for bootstrap #95253

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 10, 2022

Conversation

jyn514
Copy link
Member

@jyn514 jyn514 commented Mar 23, 2022

Note that this only runs bootstrap's self-tests, not compiler or library tests.

Helps with #94829.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Mar 23, 2022
config.out = PathBuf::from(env::var_os("BOOTSTRAP_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY").unwrap());
config.initial_rustc = PathBuf::from(env::var_os("RUSTC").unwrap());
config.initial_cargo = PathBuf::from(env::var_os("BOOTSTRAP_INITIAL_CARGO").unwrap());
config.out = PathBuf::from(env!("OUT_DIR"));
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Huh. I'm surprised this is the same behavior-wise:

If the package has a build script, this is set to the folder where the build script should place its output. See below for more information. (Only set during compilation.)

That doesn't really seem like what we want? Or at least, it seems a little weird.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ah, good point, cargo will probably cache these temporary files indefinitely. One alternative is to just use the out determined by Config::parse? But unfortunately cargo runs these tests with a working directory of src/bootstrap, so it will use src/bootstrap/build instead of the top-level build file :( you mentioned in another PR adding tempdir seems overkill, so I think OUT_DIR is probably an OK alternative? at least, it shouldn't hurt anything, nothing else in bootstrap reads from OUT_DIR.

@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

I'm interested in hearing what the next steps for cargo test are. Are you intending to add support for anything other than bootstrap itself to get run via cargo test? (It seems possible though somewhat annoying).

@Mark-Simulacrum Mark-Simulacrum added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Apr 6, 2022
@jyn514
Copy link
Member Author

jyn514 commented Apr 9, 2022

Are you intending to add support for anything other than bootstrap itself to get run via cargo test? (It seems possible though somewhat annoying).

Ooh, this is an excellent idea :D I think it wouldn't be too terrible to do if we added an integration test in src/bootstrap/tests that calls builder.ensure(test::X) for all X in test.rs :) I'll open an issue for that - not super high on my priority list, but definitely seems worth doing.

Note that this only runs bootstrap's self-tests, not compiler or library tests.
@jyn514
Copy link
Member Author

jyn514 commented Apr 9, 2022

@rustbot ready

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Apr 9, 2022
@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 10, 2022

📌 Commit a0de44f has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Apr 10, 2022
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 10, 2022

⌛ Testing commit a0de44f with merge 693dcc53bd2ca16987fd5b93582444b0ff33534b...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 10, 2022

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Apr 10, 2022
@rust-log-analyzer
Copy link
Collaborator

The job x86_64-msvc-1 failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
Some tests failed in compiletest suite=ui-fulldeps mode=ui host=x86_64-pc-windows-msvc target=x86_64-pc-windows-msvc

error: test run failed!
status: exit code: 101
command: PATH="D:\a\rust\rust\build\x86_64-pc-windows-msvc\stage2\lib\rustlib\x86_64-pc-windows-msvc\lib;C:\Program Files (x86)\Windows Kits\10\bin\x64;C:\Program Files (x86)\Windows Kits\10\bin\10.0.22000.0\x64;C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio\2019\Enterprise\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.29.30133\bin\HostX64\x64;C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio\2019\Enterprise\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.29.30133\bin\HostX64\x64;D:\a\rust\rust\build\x86_64-pc-windows-msvc\stage0-bootstrap-tools\x86_64-pc-windows-msvc\release\deps;D:\a\rust\rust\build\x86_64-pc-windows-msvc\stage0\bin;D:\a\rust\rust\ninja;D:\a\rust\rust\msys2\mingw64\bin;C:\hostedtoolcache\windows\Python\3.10.4\x64\Scripts;C:\hostedtoolcache\windows\Python\3.10.4\x64;C:\msys64\usr\bin;D:\a\rust\rust\sccache;C:\Program Files\MongoDB\Server\5.0\bin;C:\aliyun-cli;C:\vcpkg;C:\cf-cli;C:\Program Files (x86)\NSIS;C:\tools\zstd;C:\Program Files\Mercurial;C:\hostedtoolcache\windows\stack\2.7.5\x64;C:\cabal\bin;C:\ghcup\bin;C:\tools\ghc-9.2.2\bin;C:\Program Files\dotnet;C:\mysql\bin;C:\Program Files\R\R-4.1.3\bin\x64;C:\SeleniumWebDrivers\GeckoDriver;C:\Program Files (x86)\sbt\bin;C:\Program Files (x86)\GitHub CLI;C:\Program Files\Git\bin;C:\Program Files (x86)\pipx_bin;C:\hostedtoolcache\windows\go\1.15.15\x64\bin;C:\hostedtoolcache\windows\Python\3.7.9\x64\Scripts;C:\hostedtoolcache\windows\Python\3.7.9\x64;C:\hostedtoolcache\windows\Ruby\2.5.9\x64\bin;C:\tools\kotlinc\bin;C:\hostedtoolcache\windows\Java_Temurin-Hotspot_jdk\8.0.322-6\x64\bin;C:\npm\prefix;C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft SDKs\Azure\CLI2\wbin;C:\ProgramData\kind;C:\Program Files\Eclipse Foundation\jdk-8.0.302.8-hotspot\bin;C:\Windows\system32;C:\Windows;C:\Windows\System32\Wbem;C:\Windows\System32\WindowsPowerShell\v1.0;C:\Windows\System32\OpenSSH;C:\ProgramData\Chocolatey\bin;C:\Program Files\Docker;C:\Program Files\PowerShell\7;C:\Program Files\Microsoft\Web Platform Installer;C:\Program Files\dotnet;C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\130\Tools\Binn;C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\Client SDK\ODBC\170\Tools\Binn;C:\Program Files (x86)\Windows Kits\10\Windows Performance Toolkit;C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft SQL Server\110\DTS\Binn;C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft SQL Server\120\DTS\Binn;C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft SQL Server\130\DTS\Binn;C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft SQL Server\140\DTS\Binn;C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft SQL Server\150\DTS\Binn;C:\Program Files\nodejs;C:\Program Files\OpenSSL\bin;C:\Strawberry\c\bin;C:\Strawberry\perl\site\bin;C:\Strawberry\perl\bin;C:\ProgramData\chocolatey\lib\pulumi\tools\Pulumi\bin;C:\Program Files\TortoiseSVN\bin;C:\Program Files\CMake\bin;C:\ProgramData\chocolatey\lib\maven\apache-maven-3.8.5\bin;C:\Program Files\Microsoft Service Fabric\bin\Fabric\Fabric.Code;C:\Program Files\Microsoft SDKs\Service Fabric\Tools\ServiceFabricLocalClusterManager;C:\Program Files\Git\cmd;C:\Program Files\Git\mingw64\bin;C:\Program Files\Git\usr\bin;C:\Program Files\GitHub CLI;C:\tools\php;C:\Program Files (x86)\sbt\bin;C:\SeleniumWebDrivers\ChromeDriver;C:\SeleniumWebDrivers\EdgeDriver;C:\Program Files\Amazon\AWSCLIV2;C:\Program Files\Amazon\SessionManagerPlugin\bin;C:\Program Files\Amazon\AWSSAMCLI\bin;C:\Program Files (x86)\Google\Cloud SDK\google-cloud-sdk\bin;C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft BizTalk Server;C:\Program Files\LLVM\bin;C:\Users\runneradmin\.dotnet\tools;C:\Users\runneradmin\.cargo\bin;C:\Users\runneradmin\AppData\Local\Microsoft\WindowsApps" "D:\\a\\rust\\rust\\build\\x86_64-pc-windows-msvc\\test\\ui-fulldeps\\stdio-from\\a.exe"
stdout: none
--- stderr -------------------------------
I/O error: operation failed to complete synchronously
thread 'main' panicked at 'assertion failed: child2.wait()?.success()', D:\a\rust\rust\src/test\ui-fulldeps\stdio-from.rs:50:5
------------------------------------------




failures:
    [ui] src/test\ui-fulldeps\stdio-from.rs

test result: FAILED. 65 passed; 1 failed; 1 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out; finished in 26.21s

Build completed unsuccessfully in 0:35:54
make: *** [Makefile:72: ci-subset-1] Error 1

@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

@bors retry stdio-from I/O error: operation failed to complete synchronously msvc

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Apr 10, 2022
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 10, 2022

⌛ Testing commit a0de44f with merge 32c2630...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 10, 2022

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: Mark-Simulacrum
Pushing 32c2630 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Apr 10, 2022
@bors bors merged commit 32c2630 into rust-lang:master Apr 10, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.62.0 milestone Apr 10, 2022
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (32c2630): comparison url.

Summary:

  • Primary benchmarks: no relevant changes found
  • Secondary benchmarks: 🎉 relevant improvements found
Regressions 😿
(primary)
Regressions 😿
(secondary)
Improvements 🎉
(primary)
Improvements 🎉
(secondary)
All 😿 🎉
(primary)
count1 0 0 0 6 0
mean2 N/A N/A N/A -0.4% N/A
max N/A N/A N/A -0.4% N/A

If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf.

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Footnotes

  1. number of relevant changes

  2. the arithmetic mean of the percent change

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants