-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Don't suggest replacing region with 'static in NLL #89504
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
label
Oct 3, 2021
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Fixes rust-lang#73159 This is similar to rust-lang#69350 - if the user didn't initially write out a 'static lifetime, adding 'static in response to a lifetime error is usually the wrong thing to do.
Aaron1011
force-pushed
the
rpit-nll-static
branch
from
October 4, 2021 02:54
86fb94f
to
fdd8a0d
Compare
nikomatsakis
approved these changes
Oct 4, 2021
@bors r+ |
📌 Commit fdd8a0d has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Oct 4, 2021
Manishearth
added a commit
to Manishearth/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 5, 2021
…tsakis Don't suggest replacing region with 'static in NLL Fixes rust-lang#73159 This is similar to rust-lang#69350 - if the user didn't initially write out a 'static lifetime, adding 'static in response to a lifetime error is usually the wrong thing to do.
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 5, 2021
…arth Rollup of 12 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#87631 (os current_exe using same approach as linux to get always the full ab…) - rust-lang#88234 (rustdoc-json: Don't ignore impls for primitive types) - rust-lang#88651 (Use the 64b inner:monotonize() implementation not the 128b one for aarch64) - rust-lang#88816 (Rustdoc migrate to table so the gui can handle >2k constants) - rust-lang#89244 (refactor: VecDeques PairSlices fields to private) - rust-lang#89364 (rustdoc-json: Encode json files with UTF-8) - rust-lang#89423 (Fix ICE caused by non_exaustive_omitted_patterns struct lint) - rust-lang#89426 (bootstrap: add config option for nix patching) - rust-lang#89462 (haiku thread affinity build fix) - rust-lang#89482 (Follow the diagnostic output style guide) - rust-lang#89504 (Don't suggest replacing region with 'static in NLL) - rust-lang#89535 (fix busted JavaScript in error index generator) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #73159
This is similar to #69350 - if the user didn't initially
write out a 'static lifetime, adding 'static in response to
a lifetime error is usually the wrong thing to do.