-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Validate FFI-safety warnings on naked functions #87742
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
label
Aug 3, 2021
r? @Amanieu |
Test that FFI-safety warnings don't get accidentally dropped on naked functions. The big picture is that if you implement a naked function with the Rust ABI you'll get a warning. Further, if you implement a naked function with a standardized ABI, but use non-FFI-safe types you will still get a warning. rust-lang/rfcs#2774 rust-lang/rfcs#2972
15 tasks
haraldh
approved these changes
Aug 4, 2021
@bors r+ rollup |
📌 Commit a96fd57 has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Aug 4, 2021
JohnTitor
added a commit
to JohnTitor/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 6, 2021
Validate FFI-safety warnings on naked functions Test that FFI-safety warnings don't get accidentally dropped on naked functions. The big picture is that if you implement a naked function with the Rust ABI you'll get a warning. Further, if you implement a naked function with a standardized ABI, but use non-FFI-safe types you will still get a warning. rust-lang/rfcs#2774 rust-lang/rfcs#2972 cc `````@joshtriplett````` `````@Amanieu````` `````@haraldh`````
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 6, 2021
Rollup of 9 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#87561 (thread set_name haiku implementation.) - rust-lang#87715 (Add long error explanation for E0625) - rust-lang#87727 (explicit_generic_args_with_impl_trait: fix min expected number of generics) - rust-lang#87742 (Validate FFI-safety warnings on naked functions) - rust-lang#87756 (Add back -Zno-profiler-runtime) - rust-lang#87759 (Re-use std::sealed::Sealed in os/linux/process.) - rust-lang#87760 (Promote `aarch64-apple-ios-sim` to Tier 2) - rust-lang#87770 (permit drop impls with generic constants in where clauses) - rust-lang#87780 (alloc: Use intra doc links for the reserve function) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bstrie
added
the
A-naked
Area: `#[naked]`, prologue and epilogue-free, functions, https://git.io/vAzzS
label
Feb 2, 2022
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
A-naked
Area: `#[naked]`, prologue and epilogue-free, functions, https://git.io/vAzzS
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Test that FFI-safety warnings don't get accidentally dropped on naked
functions. The big picture is that if you implement a naked function
with the Rust ABI you'll get a warning. Further, if you implement a
naked function with a standardized ABI, but use non-FFI-safe types you
will still get a warning.
rust-lang/rfcs#2774
rust-lang/rfcs#2972
cc @joshtriplett @Amanieu @haraldh