Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move available_concurrency implementation to sys #85182

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jun 22, 2021

Conversation

CDirkx
Copy link
Contributor

@CDirkx CDirkx commented May 11, 2021

This splits out the platform-specific implementation of available_concurrency to the corresponding platforms under sys. No changes are made to the implementation.

Tidy didn't lint against this code being originally added outside of sys because of a bug (see #84677), this PR also reverts the exclusion that was introduced in that bugfix.

Tracking issue of available_concurrency: #74479

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @joshtriplett

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label May 11, 2021
@rustbot rustbot added the T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label May 14, 2021
@JohnCSimon JohnCSimon added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 31, 2021
@JohnTitor
Copy link
Member

Great, thanks!

r? @JohnTitor @bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 21, 2021

📌 Commit 888418a has been approved by JohnTitor

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jun 21, 2021
JohnTitor added a commit to JohnTitor/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 21, 2021
…nTitor

Move `available_concurrency` implementation to `sys`

This splits out the platform-specific implementation of `available_concurrency` to the corresponding platforms under `sys`. No changes are made to the implementation.

Tidy didn't lint against this code being originally added outside of `sys` because of a bug (see rust-lang#84677), this PR also reverts the exclusion that was introduced in that bugfix.

Tracking issue of `available_concurrency`: rust-lang#74479
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 22, 2021
Rollup of 11 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#85054 (Revert SGX inline asm syntax)
 - rust-lang#85182 (Move `available_concurrency` implementation to `sys`)
 - rust-lang#86037 (Add `io::Cursor::{remaining, remaining_slice, is_empty}`)
 - rust-lang#86114 (Reopen rust-lang#79692 (Format symbols under shared frames))
 - rust-lang#86297 (Allow to pass arguments to rustdoc-gui tool)
 - rust-lang#86334 (Resolve type aliases to the type they point to in intra-doc links)
 - rust-lang#86367 (Fix comment about rustc_inherit_overflow_checks in abs().)
 - rust-lang#86381 (Add regression test for issue rust-lang#39161)
 - rust-lang#86387 (Remove `#[allow(unused_lifetimes)]` which is now unnecessary)
 - rust-lang#86398 (Add regression test for issue rust-lang#54685)
 - rust-lang#86493 (Say "this enum variant takes"/"this struct takes" instead of "this function takes")

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 7f1a4a2 into rust-lang:master Jun 22, 2021
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.55.0 milestone Jun 22, 2021
@CDirkx CDirkx deleted the available_concurrency branch June 22, 2021 08:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants