Fix typo/inaccuracy in the documentation of Iterator::skip_while #83270
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
One of the examples used to say “this leads to a possibly confusing situation, where the type of the closure is a double reference” while _actually_ referring to the type of the closure _argument_.
|
(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
rustbot
added
A-iterators
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
|
@bors r+ rollup |
|
📌 Commit 99b2054 has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Dylan-DPC-zz
pushed a commit
to Dylan-DPC-zz/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 18, 2021
…_doc, r=joshtriplett Fix typo/inaccuracy in the documentation of Iterator::skip_while One of the examples used to say “this leads to a possibly confusing situation, where the type of the closure is a double reference” while _actually_ referring to the type of the closure _argument_. This PR just changes a single word in documentation. `@rustbot` modify labels: A-iterators, T-doc, T-lang
Dylan-DPC-zz
pushed a commit
to Dylan-DPC-zz/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 18, 2021
…_doc, r=joshtriplett Fix typo/inaccuracy in the documentation of Iterator::skip_while One of the examples used to say “this leads to a possibly confusing situation, where the type of the closure is a double reference” while _actually_ referring to the type of the closure _argument_. This PR just changes a single word in documentation. ``@rustbot`` modify labels: A-iterators, T-doc, T-lang
|
Just realized, the T-lang doesn't make sense. I've wanted to write T-lib, if anything... well, anyways @rustbot modify labels to -T-lang. |
rustbot
removed
the
T-lang
Dylan-DPC-zz
pushed a commit
to Dylan-DPC-zz/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 19, 2021
…_doc, r=joshtriplett Fix typo/inaccuracy in the documentation of Iterator::skip_while One of the examples used to say “this leads to a possibly confusing situation, where the type of the closure is a double reference” while _actually_ referring to the type of the closure _argument_. This PR just changes a single word in documentation. `@rustbot` modify labels: A-iterators, T-doc, T-lang
Dylan-DPC-zz
pushed a commit
to Dylan-DPC-zz/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 19, 2021
…_doc, r=joshtriplett Fix typo/inaccuracy in the documentation of Iterator::skip_while One of the examples used to say “this leads to a possibly confusing situation, where the type of the closure is a double reference” while _actually_ referring to the type of the closure _argument_. This PR just changes a single word in documentation. ``@rustbot`` modify labels: A-iterators, T-doc, T-lang
JohnTitor
added a commit
to JohnTitor/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 19, 2021
…_doc, r=joshtriplett Fix typo/inaccuracy in the documentation of Iterator::skip_while One of the examples used to say “this leads to a possibly confusing situation, where the type of the closure is a double reference” while _actually_ referring to the type of the closure _argument_. This PR just changes a single word in documentation. ```@rustbot``` modify labels: A-iterators, T-doc, T-lang
Dylan-DPC-zz
pushed a commit
to Dylan-DPC-zz/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 19, 2021
…_doc, r=joshtriplett Fix typo/inaccuracy in the documentation of Iterator::skip_while One of the examples used to say “this leads to a possibly confusing situation, where the type of the closure is a double reference” while _actually_ referring to the type of the closure _argument_. This PR just changes a single word in documentation. ````@rustbot```` modify labels: A-iterators, T-doc, T-lang
This was referenced Mar 19, 2021
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 19, 2021
Rollup of 11 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#82500 (Reuse `std::sys::unsupported::pipe` on `hermit`) - rust-lang#82759 (Remove unwrap_none/expect_none from compiler/.) - rust-lang#82846 (rustdoc: allow list syntax for #[doc(alias)] attributes) - rust-lang#82892 (Clarify docs for Read::read's return value) - rust-lang#83179 (Extend `proc_macro_back_compat` lint to `actix-web`) - rust-lang#83197 (Move some test-only code to test files) - rust-lang#83208 (Fix gitattibutes for old git versions) - rust-lang#83215 (Deprecate std::os::haiku::raw, which accidentally wasn't deprecated) - rust-lang#83230 (Remove unnecessary `forward_inner_docs` hack) - rust-lang#83236 (Upgrade memmap to memmap2) - rust-lang#83270 (Fix typo/inaccuracy in the documentation of Iterator::skip_while) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
One of the examples used to say “this leads to a possibly confusing situation, where the type of the closure is a double reference” while actually referring to the type of the closure argument.
This PR just changes a single word in documentation.
@rustbot modify labels: A-iterators, T-doc, T-lang