-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rollup of 10 pull requests #80866
Closed
Closed
Rollup of 10 pull requests #80866
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The size assertion in the comment was inverted compared to the code. After fixing that the implication that `(new_size >= old_size) => new_size != 0` still doesn't hold so explain why `old_size != 0` at this point.
On structured suggestion for `let` -> `const` and `const` -> `let`, use a proper `Span` and update tests to check the correct application. Follow up to rust-lang#80012.
It was only used once, in a function that was otherwise trivial.
Nearly all error messages start with a lowercase letter and don't use articles - instead they refer to the plural case.
In particular, the CI built `libLLVM-*.so` needs to have `libz.so` RPATHed so that binaries like `llvm-config` work at all.
This makes it possible to have both std::panic and core::panic as a builtin macro, by using different builtin macro names for each. Also removes SyntaxExtension::is_derive_copy, as the macro name (e.g. sym::Copy) is now tracked and provides that information directly.
This used to be necessary for `is_builtin` in the past, but is no longer required. Co-authored-by: Vadim Petrochenkov <[email protected]>
Hopefully this will prevent people from continuing to ask about this over and over again :) See [this Zulip discussion][1] for more. [1]: https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/219381-t-libs/topic/Vec.3A.3Atruncate.20implementation
…u64, r=withoutboats Implement From<char> for u64 and u128. With this PR you can write ``` let u = u64::from('👤'); let u = u128::from('👤'); ``` Previously, you could already write `as` conversions ([Playground link](https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=stable&mode=debug&edition=2018&gist=cee18febe28e69024357d099f07ca081)): ``` // Lossless conversions dbg!('👤' as u32); // Prints 128100 dbg!('👤' as u64); // Prints 128100 dbg!('👤' as u128); // Prints 128100 // truncates, thus no `From` impls. dbg!('👤' as u8); // Prints 100 dbg!('👤' as u16); // Prints 62564 // These `From` impls already exist. dbg!(u32::from('👤')); // Prints 128100 dbg!(u64::from(u32::from('👤'))); // Prints 128100 ``` The idea is from `@gendx` who opened [this Internals thread](https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/implement-from-char-for-u64/13454), and `@withoutboats` responded that someone should open a PR for it. Some people mentioned `From<char>` impls for `f32` and `f64`, but that doesn't seem correct to me, so I didn't include them here. I don't know what the feature should be named. Must it be registered somewhere, like unstable features? r? `@withoutboats`
…r=matthewjasper Improve core::ptr::drop_in_place debuginfo * Use span of the dropped type as function span when possible. * Rename symbol from `core::ptr::drop_in_place::$hash` to `{{drop}}::<$TYPE>::$hash`. Fixes rust-lang#77465 (I haven't yet updated the tests)
Fix safety comment The size assertion in the comment was inverted compared to the code. After fixing that the implication that `(new_size >= old_size) => new_size != 0` still doesn't hold so explain why `old_size != 0` at this point.
… r=petrochenkov Use correct span for structured suggestion On structured suggestion for `let` -> `const` and `const` -> `let`, use a proper `Span` and update tests to check the correct application. Follow up to rust-lang#80012.
…Gomez Remove useless `fill_in` function It was only used once, in a function that was otherwise trivial.
Use standard formatting for "rust-call" ABI message Nearly all error messages start with a lowercase letter and don't use articles - instead they refer to the plural case.
…ulacrum Support `download-ci-llvm` on NixOS In particular, the CI built `libLLVM-*.so` needs to have `libz.so` RPATHed so that binaries like `llvm-config` work at all.
…repetita, r=jyn514 Remove under-used ImplPolarity enum It doesn't make much sense to have an enum with only two possible values and to store it inside an `Option` in my opinion when you can do all the same with a simple boolean. I don't expect any chances, performance or RSS usage wise. r? `@jyn514`
…=petrochenkov Allow #[rustc_builtin_macro = "name"] This adds the option of specifying the name of a builtin macro in the `#[rustc_builtin_macro]` attribute: `#[rustc_builtin_macro = "name"]`. This makes it possible to have both `std::panic!` and `core::panic!` as a builtin macro, by using different builtin macro names for each. This is needed to implement the edition-specific behaviour of the panic macros of RFC 3007. Also removes `SyntaxExtension::is_derive_copy`, as the macro name (e.g. `sym::Copy`) is now tracked and provides that information directly. r? `@petrochenkov`
…ttmcm Add comment to `Vec::truncate` explaining `>` vs `>=` Hopefully this will prevent people from continuing to ask about this over and over again :) See [this Zulip discussion][1] for more. [1]: https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/219381-t-libs/topic/Vec.3A.3Atruncate.20implementation r? `@scottmcm`
@bors r+ rollup=never p=10 |
📌 Commit 44a118f has been approved by |
bors
added
the
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
label
Jan 10, 2021
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
|
@bors r- |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-author
Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author.
and removed
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
labels
Jan 10, 2021
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
S-waiting-on-author
Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
fill_in
function #80803 (Remove uselessfill_in
function)download-ci-llvm
on NixOS #80820 (Supportdownload-ci-llvm
on NixOS)Vec::truncate
explaining>
vs>=
#80857 (Add comment toVec::truncate
explaining>
vs>=
)Failed merges:
r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup