-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Don't look for blanket impls in intra-doc links #79682
Conversation
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
1ac6c26
to
b388a9b
Compare
I'm testing locally that this actually improves the compile times for #78761. |
b388a9b
to
41ef900
Compare
Yup, this brought intra-doc links down to only 1.5 seconds 🎉 (down from 90 seconds). |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
9917b2a
to
667f6d5
Compare
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #80044) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. Note that reviewers usually do not review pull requests until merge conflicts are resolved! Once you resolve the conflicts, you should change the labels applied by bors to indicate that your PR is ready for review. Post this as a comment to change the labels:
|
667f6d5
to
e75c637
Compare
This never worked and has been causing severe performance problems. Hopefully it will be re-landed at some point in the future when it actually works, but in the meantime it makes no sense to have the code around when it does nothing and actively makes rustdoc harder to use.
e75c637
to
6580f11
Compare
@bors r=Manishearth,GuillaumeGomez |
📌 Commit 6580f11 has been approved by |
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
This never worked and has been causing severe performance problems.
Hopefully it will be re-landed at some point in the future when it
actually works, but in the meantime it makes no sense to have the code
around when it does nothing and actively makes rustdoc harder to use.
Closes #78761. Does not affect #78800.
r? @Manishearth
cc @seeplusplus