-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
bootstrap: use the same version number for rustc and cargo #79133
Conversation
Also opened a forge PR to update the release process: rust-lang/rust-forge#471 Nominating this for beta backport: it should not cause any issue, and it will simplify producing the 1.49 release too. |
Historically the stable tarballs were named after the version number of the specific tool, instead of the version number of Rust. For example, both of the following tarballs were part of the same release: rustc-1.48.0-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.tar.xz cargo-0.49.0-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.tar.xz PR rust-lang#77336 changed the dist code to instead use Rust's version number for all the tarballs, regardless of the tool they contain: rustc-1.48.0-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.tar.xz cargo-1.48.0-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.tar.xz Because of that there is no need anymore to have a separate `cargo` field in src/stage0.txt, as the Cargo version will always be the same as the rustc version. This PR removes the field, simplifying the code and the maintenance work required while producing releases.
0ee41fb
to
d17874f
Compare
@bors r+ |
📌 Commit d17874f has been approved by |
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #79132) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. Note that reviewers usually do not review pull requests until merge conflicts are resolved! Once you resolve the conflicts, you should change the labels applied by bors to indicate that your PR is ready for review. Post this as a comment to change the labels:
|
…k-Simulacrum bootstrap: use the same version number for rustc and cargo Historically the stable tarballs were named after the version number ofthe specific tool, instead of the version number of Rust. For example, both of the following tarballs were part of the same release: rustc-1.48.0-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.tar.xz cargo-0.49.0-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.tar.xz PR rust-lang#77336 changed the dist code to instead use Rust's version number for all the tarballs, regardless of the tool they contain: rustc-1.48.0-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.tar.xz cargo-1.48.0-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.tar.xz Because of that there is no need anymore to have a separate `cargo` field in `src/stage0.txt`, as the Cargo version will always be the same as the rustc version. This PR removes the field, simplifying the code and the maintenance work required while producing releases. r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
Rollup of 11 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#78361 (Updated the list of white-listed target features for x86) - rust-lang#78785 (linux: try to use libc getrandom to allow interposition) - rust-lang#78999 (stability: More precise location for deprecation lint on macros) - rust-lang#79039 (Tighten the bounds on atomic Ordering in std::sys::unix::weak::Weak) - rust-lang#79079 (Turn top-level comments into module docs in MIR visitor) - rust-lang#79114 (add trailing_zeros and leading_zeros to non zero types) - rust-lang#79131 (Enable AVX512 *epi64 variants by updating stdarch) - rust-lang#79133 (bootstrap: use the same version number for rustc and cargo) - rust-lang#79145 (Fix handling of panic calls) - rust-lang#79151 (Fix typo in `std::io::Write` docs) - rust-lang#79158 (type is too big -> values of the type are too big) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Update release process for rust-lang/rust#79133
…ulacrum [beta] backports * [beta] always disable copy_file_range to avoid EOVERFLOW errors rust-lang#79008 * Enforce no-move rule of ReentrantMutex using Pin and fix UB in stdio rust-lang#77801 * bootstrap: use the same version number for rustc and cargo rust-lang#79133 * [beta] Revert "Enable ASLR for windows-gnu" rust-lang#79141 * [beta] revert rust-lang#78790, vendor libtest for rustc-src rust-lang#79571 * Mirror centos vault to S3 rust-lang#79435 * [beta] Update cargo rust-lang#79739 This also bumps to non-dev stable compiler. r? `@ghost`
Historically the stable tarballs were named after the version number ofthe specific tool, instead of the version number of Rust. For example, both of the following tarballs were part of the same release:
PR #77336 changed the dist code to instead use Rust's version number for all the tarballs, regardless of the tool they contain:
Because of that there is no need anymore to have a separate
cargo
field insrc/stage0.txt
, as the Cargo version will always be the same as the rustc version. This PR removes the field, simplifying the code and the maintenance work required while producing releases.r? @Mark-Simulacrum