Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[mir-opt] Introduce a new flag to enable experimental/unsound mir opts #76899

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 28, 2020

Conversation

wesleywiser
Copy link
Member

This implements part of rust-lang/compiler-team#319. The exact name of this flag was not decided as part of that MCP and some people expressed that it should include "unsound" in some way.

I've chosen to use enable-experimental-unsound-mir-opts as the name. While long, I don't think that matters too much as really it will only be used by some mir-opt tests. If you object or have a better name, please leave a comment!

r? @oli-obk
cc @rust-lang/wg-mir-opt @RalfJung

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Sep 19, 2020
@Aaron1011
Copy link
Member

Aaron1011 commented Sep 19, 2020

I would personally prefer unsound-mir-opts:

  • It's easier to type.
  • We could theoretically move a non-experimental optimization pass behind this flag if we discovered it was unsound.
  • I think 'enable' is implied by the presence of the flag itself.

@wesleywiser
Copy link
Member Author

wesleywiser commented Sep 19, 2020

@oli-obk I tried to keep our MIR opt tests' output as close to the current ones as possible. Some of these passes run after copy-prop so the effects of it being disabled by default (even under mir-opt-level=2) show up as changes in the tests.

If you think we should not add this flag to those tests and accept the changes instead, I'd be happy to do so.

@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor

oli-obk commented Sep 19, 2020

If you think we should not add this flag to those tests and accept the changes instead, I'd be happy to do so.

Maybe remove the flag again in a separate commit so we keep the changes separate?

@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor

oli-obk commented Sep 19, 2020

With that and the flag renamed to unsound-mir-opts as suggested: r=me

@RalfJung
Copy link
Member

RalfJung commented Sep 19, 2020 via email

@wesleywiser
Copy link
Member Author

@RalfJung I remember you felt quite strongly the option name should include "unsound". Does unsound-mir-opts work for you?

@tmiasko
Copy link
Contributor

tmiasko commented Sep 19, 2020

Is this option intended only for unsound passes or also that are buggy in other ways e.g., ICE? If the latter I would also include inlining pass. Recently when I evaluated mir-opt-level=2 on a different crates, rustc generally ICEd due to normalization issues in inliner or other issues exposed indirectly by inlining. The attempt to enable inlining in #75495 didn't fare any better.

@wesleywiser
Copy link
Member Author

Originally, I was thinking this flag could handle both but now I'm thinking we should probably have two. The optimizations that have bugs which result in unsoundness are far worse than the ones that "just" ICE the compiler.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 20, 2020

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #72632) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

Note that reviewers usually do not review pull requests until merge conflicts are resolved! Once you resolve the conflicts, you should change the labels applied by bors to indicate that your PR is ready for review. Post this as a comment to change the labels:

@rustbot modify labels: +S-waiting-on-review -S-waiting-on-author

@RalfJung
Copy link
Member

@RalfJung I remember you felt quite strongly the option name should include "unsound". Does unsound-mir-opts work for you?

Yes I like that name. :)

@wesleywiser wesleywiser force-pushed the experimental_unsound_mir_opts_flag branch 2 times, most recently from 4f4cc60 to 3498511 Compare September 21, 2020 02:11
@wesleywiser
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r=oli-obk

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 21, 2020

📌 Commit 3498511 has been approved by oli-obk

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Sep 21, 2020
Dylan-DPC-zz pushed a commit to Dylan-DPC-zz/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 22, 2020
…r_opts_flag, r=oli-obk

[mir-opt] Introduce a new flag to enable experimental/unsound mir opts

This implements part of rust-lang/compiler-team#319. The exact name of this flag was not decided as part of that MCP and some people expressed that it should include "unsound" in some way.

I've chosen to use `enable-experimental-unsound-mir-opts` as the name. While long, I don't think that matters too much as really it will only be used by some mir-opt tests. If you object or have a better name, please leave a comment!

r? @oli-obk
cc @rust-lang/wg-mir-opt @RalfJung
@Dylan-DPC-zz
Copy link

failed in rollup CI

@bors r-

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Sep 23, 2020
@wesleywiser wesleywiser force-pushed the experimental_unsound_mir_opts_flag branch from 3498511 to 2c5f061 Compare September 25, 2020 00:50
@wesleywiser
Copy link
Member Author

Rebased and resolved the failing test from the rollup.

@bors r=oli-obk

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 25, 2020

📌 Commit 2c5f061d187b346c7f9e229a53be41723164ec30 has been approved by oli-obk

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Sep 25, 2020
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 25, 2020

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #76844) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

Note that reviewers usually do not review pull requests until merge conflicts are resolved! Once you resolve the conflicts, you should change the labels applied by bors to indicate that your PR is ready for review. Post this as a comment to change the labels:

@rustbot modify labels: +S-waiting-on-review -S-waiting-on-author

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Sep 25, 2020
@wesleywiser wesleywiser force-pushed the experimental_unsound_mir_opts_flag branch from 2c5f061 to c653af8 Compare September 27, 2020 23:29
@wesleywiser
Copy link
Member Author

Rebased

@bors r=oli-obk

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 28, 2020

📌 Commit c653af8 has been approved by oli-obk

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Sep 28, 2020
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 28, 2020

⌛ Testing commit c653af8 with merge d62d3f7...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 28, 2020

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions, checks-azure
Approved by: oli-obk
Pushing d62d3f7 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Sep 28, 2020
@bors bors merged commit d62d3f7 into rust-lang:master Sep 28, 2020
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.48.0 milestone Sep 28, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants