-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
expand: More precise locations for expansion-time lints #73178
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
r? @varkor (rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
label
Jun 9, 2020
This was referenced Jun 9, 2020
@bors r+ |
📌 Commit d60df53 has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Jun 11, 2020
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 12, 2020
Rollup of 5 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#72906 (Migrate to numeric associated consts) - rust-lang#73178 (expand: More precise locations for expansion-time lints) - rust-lang#73225 (Allow inference regions when relating consts) - rust-lang#73236 (Clean up E0666 explanation) - rust-lang#73273 (Fix Zulip pings) Failed merges: r? @ghost
m-ou-se
added a commit
to m-ou-se/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 18, 2020
stability: More precise location for deprecation lint on macros One missing piece of rust-lang#73178.
m-ou-se
added a commit
to m-ou-se/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 18, 2020
stability: More precise location for deprecation lint on macros One missing piece of rust-lang#73178.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
First commit: a macro expansion doesn't have a
NodeId
associated with it, but it has a parentDefId
which we can use for linting.The observable effect is that lints associated with macro expansions can now be
allow
ed at finer-grained level than whole crate.Second commit: each macro definition has a
NodeId
which we can use for linting, unless that macro definition was decoded from other crate.