Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove unused read_uleb128 parameter. #68661

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 30, 2020

Conversation

nnethercote
Copy link
Contributor

@nnethercote nnethercote commented Jan 30, 2020

No description provided.

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jan 30, 2020
@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 30, 2020

📌 Commit 6961db2 has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jan 30, 2020
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 30, 2020

⌛ Testing commit 6961db2 with merge 212b2c7...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 30, 2020
…rk-Simulacrum

Remove unused `read_uleb128` parameter.
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 30, 2020

☀️ Test successful - checks-azure
Approved by: Mark-Simulacrum
Pushing 212b2c7 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Jan 30, 2020
@bors bors merged commit 6961db2 into rust-lang:master Jan 30, 2020
@nnethercote nnethercote deleted the rm-unused-read_uleb128-param branch January 31, 2020 04:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants