Reexport IntErrorKind in std #60185
Merged
Reexport IntErrorKind in std #60185
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
r? @rkruppe (rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
|
We do have a few rustc-specific lints that only run on its own codebase. Maybe it wouldn't be too difficult to add one for this as well? |
|
This change looks good to me as-is. For the possibility of a lint catching similar issues elsewhere, if anyone is interested I suggest opening an issue so the idea doesn't get buried. @bors r+ rollup |
|
📌 Commit 7af0fcc has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Centril
added a commit
to Centril/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 25, 2019
… r=rkruppe Reexport IntErrorKind in std Currently `IntErrorKind` can only be found in `core`. @Centril confirmed on Discord that this is unintentional (should I r? him in this situation?). Should there be a test for this? As far as this *specific* situation goes, I don't think so, I'll risk it and say that there's no way this regresses. However, it might be a good idea to have some tool detect public items in `core` that are not reexported in `std`. Does this belong in tidy, or should that be a separate tool? Is there some rustc-specific *linter*? Unless that's entirely a dumb idea, this should probably get an issue. Note: My local build hasn't finished yet, but it's well past the point where I would expect problems.
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 25, 2019
Rollup of 6 pull requests Successful merges: - #59560 (MIR generation cleanup) - #59697 (tweak unresolved label suggestion) - #60038 (Add codegen test for PGO instrumentation.) - #60160 (Fix #58270, fix off-by-one error in error diagnostics.) - #60185 (Reexport IntErrorKind in std) - #60243 (Add regression test for #53249.) Failed merges: r? @ghost
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Currently
IntErrorKindcan only be found incore. @Centril confirmed on Discord that this is unintentional (should I r? him in this situation?).Should there be a test for this? As far as this specific situation goes, I don't think so, I'll risk it and say that there's no way this regresses. However, it might be a good idea to have some tool detect public items in
corethat are not reexported instd. Does this belong in tidy, or should that be a separate tool? Is there some rustc-specific linter? Unless that's entirely a dumb idea, this should probably get an issue.Note: My local build hasn't finished yet, but it's well past the point where I would expect problems.