Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix a small mistake regarding NaNs in a deprecation message #56857

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 16, 2018
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
3 changes: 2 additions & 1 deletion src/libstd/f32.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -550,7 +550,8 @@ impl f32 {
#[inline]
#[rustc_deprecated(since = "1.10.0",
reason = "you probably meant `(self - other).abs()`: \
this operation is `(self - other).max(0.0)` (also \
this operation is `(self - other).max(0.0)` \
except that `abs_sub` also propagates NaNs (also \
known as `fdimf` in C). If you truly need the positive \
difference, consider using that expression or the C function \
`fdimf`, depending on how you wish to handle NaN (please consider \
Expand Down
3 changes: 2 additions & 1 deletion src/libstd/f64.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -491,7 +491,8 @@ impl f64 {
#[inline]
#[rustc_deprecated(since = "1.10.0",
reason = "you probably meant `(self - other).abs()`: \
this operation is `(self - other).max(0.0)` (also \
this operation is `(self - other).max(0.0)` \
except that `abs_sub` also propagates NaNs (also \
known as `fdim` in C). If you truly need the positive \
difference, consider using that expression or the C function \
`fdim`, depending on how you wish to handle NaN (please consider \
Expand Down