-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use #[non_exhaustive] on internal enums #53395
Merged
bors
merged 5 commits into
rust-lang:master
from
varkor:__Nonexhaustive-to-non_exhaustive
Aug 16, 2018
Merged
Use #[non_exhaustive] on internal enums #53395
bors
merged 5 commits into
rust-lang:master
from
varkor:__Nonexhaustive-to-non_exhaustive
Aug 16, 2018
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
r? @shepmaster (rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
label
Aug 15, 2018
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Makes sense to me! Nice to remove never-stable features and "impossible" panics! @bors r+ rollup |
📌 Commit 27f2a84 has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Aug 16, 2018
kennytm
added a commit
to kennytm/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 16, 2018
…stive, r=shepmaster Use #[non_exhaustive] on internal enums This replaces `__Nonexhaustive` variants (and variants thereof) with `#[non_exhaustive]`. These were mostly unstable previously, with the exception of the `cloudabi` enums and `Level` in proc_macro: these were `#[doc(hidden)]`, so clearly intended not to be used directly. It should be safe to replace all of these.
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 16, 2018
Rollup of 10 pull requests Successful merges: - #52946 (Documented impl From on line 367 of libserialize/json.rs) - #53234 (Remove Travis shutdown debug scripts, and remove CI-specific DNS settings) - #53313 (Two small improvements) - #53360 (Addressed #51602) - #53364 (Warn if the user tries to use GATs) - #53373 (Tweak unclosed delimiter parser error) - #53377 (std: Use target_pointer_width for BACKTRACE_ELF_SIZE) - #53395 (Use #[non_exhaustive] on internal enums) - #53399 (Tidy: ignore non-Markdown files when linting for the Unstable Book) - #53412 (syntax_ext: remove leftover span_err_if_not_stage0 macro.)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This replaces
__Nonexhaustive
variants (and variants thereof) with#[non_exhaustive]
. These were mostly unstable previously, with the exception of thecloudabi
enums andLevel
in proc_macro: these were#[doc(hidden)]
, so clearly intended not to be used directly. It should be safe to replace all of these.