Rollup of 8 pull requests #42185
Closed
Rollup of 8 pull requests #42185
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Member
frewsxcv
commented
May 24, 2017
frewsxcv
commented
- Successful merges: Use the improved submodule handling #42081, rustbuild: don't create a source tarball when installing #42109, remove "much" from unicode diagnostic #42120, Fix building std without backtrace feature, which was broken in ca8b754 #42141, Implement requires_synchronized_create() for Redox #42142, Document drop more. #42159, Give step_trait a distinct tracking issue from step_by #42169, Remove some needless // gate-test- comments #42177
- Failed merges:
This was breaking the libstd build for Redox.
Also, improve the split mechanism to address space in paths.
only create source tarball for the Dist subcommand mark install rule as default for Kind::Install split install-docs split install-std factor out empty_dir handling split install-cargo split install-analysis split install-src rework install-rustc properly handle cross-compilation setups for install use pkgname in install split plain source tarball generation from rust-src dist document src-tarball in config.toml.exmaple Signed-off-by: Marc-Antoine Perennou <[email protected]>
iterator_step_by has decoupled their futures, so the tracking issue should split.
Signed-off-by: Marc-Antoine Perennou <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Marc-Antoine Perennou <[email protected]>
Also, add detection to treat such comments as tidy errors. We also remove the found_lib_feature code because it was just repeating the found_feature code. Originally it was intended to allow for gate-test lines for lib features, but apparently nobody missed it.
…idanhs Use the improved submodule handling r? @alexcrichton That was a crap... ``` Updating submodules Traceback (most recent call last): File "./x.py", line 20, in <module> bootstrap.main() File "/home/ishitatsuyuki/Documents/rust/src/bootstrap/bootstrap.py", line 684, in main bootstrap() File "/home/ishitatsuyuki/Documents/rust/src/bootstrap/bootstrap.py", line 662, in bootstrap rb.update_submodules() File "/home/ishitatsuyuki/Documents/rust/src/bootstrap/bootstrap.py", line 566, in update_submodules path = line[1:].split(' ')[1] TypeError: a bytes-like object is required, not 'str' ``` Maybe we need to confirm the compatibility of git options, such as `git config` or `git -C` (I believe they existed long before, though). This is tested locally.
rustbuild: don't create a source tarball when installing This splits Install out of Dist as it is not a full dist anymore, and creates the source tarball only for the Dist command. This will allow splitting install in a few rules if we want as it's done for other phases.
remove "much" from unicode diagnostic The English seems slightly awkward to me, and it's unnecessary.
Fix building std without backtrace feature, which was broken in ca8b754 Fixes rust-lang#42139
Implement requires_synchronized_create() for Redox This was breaking the libstd build for Redox.
Document drop more. Adds two examples to Drop and describes the recursive drop on types that contain fields.
…excrichton Give step_trait a distinct tracking issue from step_by iterator_step_by has decoupled their futures, so the tracking issue should split. Old issue: rust-lang#27741 New issue: rust-lang#42168 r? @alexcrichton (another follow-up to closed PR rust-lang#42110 (comment))
Remove some needless // gate-test- comments Also, add detection to treat such comments as tidy errors. We also remove the found_lib_feature code because it was just repeating the found_feature code. Originally it was intended to allow for gate-test lines for lib features, but apparently nobody missed it.
|
Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @nikomatsakis (or someone else) soon. If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. Due to the way GitHub handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes. Please see the contribution instructions for more information. |
|
@bors r+ p=10 |
|
📌 Commit 308cbf3 has been approved by |
|
⌛ Testing commit 308cbf3 with merge 7024008... |
|
💔 Test failed - status-travis |
|
Dist-check failed (#42109) |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.