Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

syntax: Parse trait object types starting with a lifetime bound #41542

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 29, 2017

Conversation

petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #39085

This was originally implemented in #40043, then reverted, then there was some agreement that it should be supported.
(This is hopefully the last PR related to bound parsing.)

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @nikomatsakis

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@aidanhs aidanhs added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Apr 26, 2017
@nikomatsakis
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 28, 2017

📌 Commit d349e87 has been approved by nikomatsakis

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 28, 2017

⌛ Testing commit d349e87 with merge 810ed98...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 28, 2017
syntax: Parse trait object types starting with a lifetime bound

Fixes #39085

This was originally implemented in #40043, then reverted, then there was some [agreement](#39318 (comment)) that it should be supported.
(This is hopefully the last PR related to bound parsing.)
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 29, 2017

☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis
Approved by: nikomatsakis
Pushing 810ed98 to master...

@bors bors merged commit d349e87 into rust-lang:master Apr 29, 2017
@petrochenkov petrochenkov deleted the objpars2 branch August 26, 2017 00:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants