Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix book: refer to add_two as "tested function" #39278

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 25, 2017
Merged

Conversation

das-g
Copy link
Contributor

@das-g das-g commented Jan 24, 2017

refer to add_two as "tested function" rather than "test function", which would be it_works

rather than "test function", which would be `it_works`
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @steveklabnik (or someone else) soon.

If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. Due to the way GitHub handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information.

@steveklabnik
Copy link
Member

@bors: r+ rollup

nice catch, thank you!

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 24, 2017

📌 Commit c4c86dd has been approved by steveklabnik

GuillaumeGomez added a commit to GuillaumeGomez/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 25, 2017
fix book: refer to `add_two` as "tested function"

refer to `add_two` as "tested function" rather than "test function", which would be `it_works`
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 25, 2017
Rollup of 6 pull requests

- Successful merges: #38930, #39212, #39251, #39267, #39276, #39278
- Failed merges:
@bors bors merged commit c4c86dd into rust-lang:master Jan 25, 2017
@das-g das-g deleted the patch-1 branch January 26, 2017 10:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants