Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Translate "ignored" closure expressions. #26079

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 9, 2015

Conversation

eefriedman
Copy link
Contributor

This isn't a very clean fix, but I'm not sure what a better fix would look
like.

Fixes #24779.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @pcwalton (or someone else) soon.

If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. The way Github handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information.

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

r? @nrc

@rust-highfive rust-highfive assigned nrc and unassigned pcwalton Jun 8, 2015
// Even if we don't have a value to emit, and the expression
// doesn't have any side-effects, we still have to translate the
// body of any closures.
// TOOD: Find a better way of handling this case.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

typo - TOOD - should be FIXME (TOOD will break make tidy)

@nrc
Copy link
Member

nrc commented Jun 8, 2015

r=me modulo the typo

@eefriedman
Copy link
Contributor Author

Updated.

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

Thanks! Could you squash the commits together as well?

This isn't a very clean fix, but I'm not sure what a better fix would look
like.

Fixes rust-lang#24779.
@eefriedman
Copy link
Contributor Author

Squashed.

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

@bors: r=nrc 22442f83

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 8, 2015

🙀 22442f83 is not a valid commit SHA. Please try again with 2442f83.

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

@bors: r=nrc 2442f83

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 8, 2015

⌛ Testing commit 2442f83 with merge 521f82e...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 8, 2015
This isn't a very clean fix, but I'm not sure what a better fix would look
like.

Fixes #24779.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

LLVM invalid linkage error from nested closures
6 participants