Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

rustc: Link entire archives of native libraries #16110

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 4, 2014

Conversation

alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

As discovered in #15460, a particular #[link(kind = "static", ...)] line is not
actually guaranteed to link the library at all. The reason for this is that if
the external library doesn't have any referenced symbols in the object generated
by rustc, the entire library is dropped by the linker.

For dynamic native libraries, this is solved by passing -lfoo for all downstream
compilations unconditionally. For static libraries in rlibs this is solved
because the entire archive is bundled in the rlib. The only situation in which
this was a problem was when a static native library was linked to a rust dynamic
library.

This commit brings the behavior of dylibs in line with rlibs by passing the
--whole-archive flag to the linker when linking native libraries. On OSX, this
uses the -force_load flag. This flag ensures that the entire archive is
considered candidate for being linked into the final dynamic library.

This is a breaking change because if any static library is included twice in the
same compilation unit then the linker will start emitting errors about duplicate
definitions now. The fix for this would involve only statically linking to a
library once.

Closes #15460
[breaking-change]

As discovered in rust-lang#15460, a particular #[link(kind = "static", ...)] line is not
actually guaranteed to link the library at all. The reason for this is that if
the external library doesn't have any referenced symbols in the object generated
by rustc, the entire library is dropped by the linker.

For dynamic native libraries, this is solved by passing -lfoo for all downstream
compilations unconditionally. For static libraries in rlibs this is solved
because the entire archive is bundled in the rlib. The only situation in which
this was a problem was when a static native library was linked to a rust dynamic
library.

This commit brings the behavior of dylibs in line with rlibs by passing the
--whole-archive flag to the linker when linking native libraries. On OSX, this
uses the -force_load flag. This flag ensures that the entire archive is
considered candidate for being linked into the final dynamic library.

This is a breaking change because if any static library is included twice in the
same compilation unit then the linker will start emitting errors about duplicate
definitions now. The fix for this would involve only statically linking to a
library once.

Closes rust-lang#15460
[breaking-change]
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 4, 2014
As discovered in #15460, a particular #[link(kind = "static", ...)] line is not
actually guaranteed to link the library at all. The reason for this is that if
the external library doesn't have any referenced symbols in the object generated
by rustc, the entire library is dropped by the linker.

For dynamic native libraries, this is solved by passing -lfoo for all downstream
compilations unconditionally. For static libraries in rlibs this is solved
because the entire archive is bundled in the rlib. The only situation in which
this was a problem was when a static native library was linked to a rust dynamic
library.

This commit brings the behavior of dylibs in line with rlibs by passing the
--whole-archive flag to the linker when linking native libraries. On OSX, this
uses the -force_load flag. This flag ensures that the entire archive is
considered candidate for being linked into the final dynamic library.

This is a breaking change because if any static library is included twice in the
same compilation unit then the linker will start emitting errors about duplicate
definitions now. The fix for this would involve only statically linking to a
library once.

Closes #15460
[breaking-change]
@bors bors closed this Aug 4, 2014
@bors bors merged commit 1ae1461 into rust-lang:master Aug 4, 2014
@alexcrichton alexcrichton deleted the issue-15460 branch August 16, 2014 05:18
bors pushed a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 3, 2024
Fixes rust-lang#16110.

The way rust desugars doc comments when expanding macros
is rendering it as raw strings delimited with hashes.
Rust-analyzer wasn't aware of this, so the desugared doc
comments wouldn't match correctly when on the LHS of macro
declarations.

This PR fixes this by porting the code used by rustc: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/4cfdbd328b7171b2328d11b950b1af0978d6b1ef/compiler/rustc_ast/src/tokenstream.rs#L6837
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 3, 2024
…-to-raw-string, r=Veykril

fix(mbe): desugar doc correctly for mbe

Fixes rust-lang#16110.

The way rust desugars doc comments when expanding macros is rendering it as raw strings delimited with hashes. Rust-analyzer wasn't aware of this, so the desugared doc comments wouldn't match correctly when on the LHS of macro declarations.

This PR fixes this by porting the code used by rustc:
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/59096cdad0e527ce4d254b55aca58539f726d3d6/compiler/rustc_ast/src/tokenstream.rs#L662-L671
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Linking a static native library to a dynamic rust library doesn't necessarily actually link
2 participants