-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Stabilize noop_waker #133089
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Stabilize noop_waker #133089
Conversation
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
5f259ac
to
55041d3
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Stabilizing this seems reasonable to me! We spent an extended period discussing this in @rust-lang/wg-async triage earlier this year, and I believe we were generally in favor of moving forward with this API. Thank you for putting this up!
@rfcbot fcp merge |
Team member @Amanieu has proposed to merge this. The next step is review by the rest of the tagged team members: No concerns currently listed. Once a majority of reviewers approve (and at most 2 approvals are outstanding), this will enter its final comment period. If you spot a major issue that hasn't been raised at any point in this process, please speak up! See this document for info about what commands tagged team members can give me. |
🔔 This is now entering its final comment period, as per the review above. 🔔 |
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #133349) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
2f45ea5
to
279d3d2
Compare
@bors r=dtolnay rollup=never I somehow managed not to include the change to |
🔒 Merge conflict This pull request and the master branch diverged in a way that cannot be automatically merged. Please rebase on top of the latest master branch, and let the reviewer approve again. How do I rebase?Assuming
You may also read Git Rebasing to Resolve Conflicts by Drew Blessing for a short tutorial. Please avoid the "Resolve conflicts" button on GitHub. It uses Sometimes step 4 will complete without asking for resolution. This is usually due to difference between how Error message
|
Co-authored-by: zachs18 <[email protected]>
279d3d2
to
31689e9
Compare
@bors r=dtolnay Rebased after conflicting upstream changes. |
Be aware that #133849 is going to churn all of the coverage-test snapshot files, so if that lands you'll need another rebase and bless to fix the conflicts. But the test Also, it looks like this PR is not actually in the bors queue for some reason, despite being approved. |
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #133865) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
Tracking Issue: #98286
This is a handy feature that's been used widely in tests and example async code and it'd be nice to make it available to users.
cc @rust-lang/wg-async