Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 8 pull requests #131934

Merged
merged 17 commits into from
Oct 19, 2024
Merged

Rollup of 8 pull requests #131934

merged 17 commits into from
Oct 19, 2024

Conversation

matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

hirschenberger and others added 17 commits October 18, 2024 17:27
Fixes rust-lang#131471 by checking if the range-start is a literal.
- Implement environment variable functions
- Using EFI Shell protocol.

Signed-off-by: Ayush Singh <[email protected]>
- Since in almost all cases, there will only be 1 UEFI shell, share the
  shell handle between all functions that require it.

Signed-off-by: Ayush Singh <[email protected]>
std: uefi: Add basic Env variables

- Implement environment variable functions
- Using EFI Shell protocol.
…errors

Fix range misleading field access

Fixes rust-lang#131471 by checking if the range-start is a literal.
bootstrap: allow setting `--jobs` in config.toml

Allow setting `--jobs` in config.toml's `[build]` section.

```toml
[build]
jobs = 0
```

If this is unset or set to zero in config.toml, we look at `--jobs` flag. If that is also unset, then we fallback to `std::thread::available_parallelism`. If that is not available, then we default to `1`. The flags and `available_parallelism` fallback are already setup, this PR just adds a config.toml option to wire that up.

Closes rust-lang#131836.

r? bootstrap
…traviscross

Update `use` keyword docs to describe precise capturing

I noticed that the standard library keyword docs for the `use` keyword haven't been updated yet to describe the new precise capturing syntax.
Mark unexpected variant res suggestion as having placeholders

Fixes rust-lang#131878
…g, r=notriddle,GuillaumeGomez

rustdoc: Switch from FxHash to sha256 for static file hashing.

Fixes rust-lang#129533 (comment)

fxhash isn't well defined, and it's implementation is being changed in rust-lang#129533. But because rustdoc uses it for static files (and encodes that hashing in rustdoc.css), this broke our tests. Given that this isn't performace critical, I think the right fix is to used a well-defined hash that will never change its definition. I've picked (rather arbitrarily) sha256.
small interpreter error cleanup

- Add `InterpretResult::map_err_kind` for the common case of swapping out the error kind (while preserving the backtrace pointing to the original error source)
- Rename `InterpError` -> `InterpErrorKind` to be consistent with the `kind` field name, and make it more clear that this is not the final error type
…pratt

zero-sized accesses are fine on null pointers

We entirely forgot to update all the function docs when changing the central docs. That's the problem with helpfully repeating shared definitions in tons of places...
@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Oct 19, 2024
@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=8

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 19, 2024

📌 Commit 7a6d436 has been approved by matthiaskrgr

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Oct 19, 2024
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 19, 2024

⌛ Testing commit 7a6d436 with merge 8069f8d...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 19, 2024

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: matthiaskrgr
Pushing 8069f8d to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Oct 19, 2024
@bors bors merged commit 8069f8d into rust-lang:master Oct 19, 2024
7 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.84.0 milestone Oct 19, 2024
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:

PR# Message Perf Build Sha
#127462 std: uefi: Add basic Env variables e1d29bd67749e9b6216a110ee0811a421a5f4ce2 (link)
#131537 Fix range misleading field access 40fb3a1a79eb4fba365b1cd196129e3cca0bafe8 (link)
#131838 bootstrap: allow setting --jobs in config.toml 09026144ae2fa7149c81ec3f25d17429692656b4 (link)
#131890 Update use keyword docs to describe precise capturing 83f946eb690a3573382b7b65f456a8fc7f17321b (link)
#131899 Mark unexpected variant res suggestion as having placeholde… 73c97b655cdcc0370b7bceb017927fd78ff0eb7d (link)
#131908 rustdoc: Switch from FxHash to sha256 for static file hashi… 5a3fb77578c7d3d14c7abc4188ef512e96a0d75a (link)
#131916 small interpreter error cleanup c340c6ffe193c6d0e8fc26ac4123842a1b54ef13 (link)
#131919 zero-sized accesses are fine on null pointers 1f9cb31382a1eeffcbf7590b89f87aad94a2756e (link)

previous master: a2a1206811

In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: @rust-timer build $SHA

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (8069f8d): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - please read the text below

Our benchmarks found a performance regression caused by this PR.
This might be an actual regression, but it can also be just noise.

Next Steps:

  • If the regression was expected or you think it can be justified,
    please write a comment with sufficient written justification, and add
    @rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged to it, to mark the regression as triaged.
  • If you think that you know of a way to resolve the regression, try to create
    a new PR with a fix for the regression.
  • If you do not understand the regression or you think that it is just noise,
    you can ask the @rust-lang/wg-compiler-performance working group for help (members of this group
    were already notified of this PR).

@rustbot label: +perf-regression
cc @rust-lang/wg-compiler-performance

Instruction count

This is the most reliable metric that we have; it was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment. However, even this metric can sometimes exhibit noise.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
0.3% [0.3%, 0.3%] 2
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
0.2% [0.2%, 0.3%] 11
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-0.2% [-0.2%, -0.2%] 1
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) 0.1% [-0.2%, 0.3%] 3

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (secondary 4.3%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
4.3% [3.2%, 5.4%] 2
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Cycles

Results (secondary 8.1%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
8.1% [8.1%, 8.1%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 782.005s -> 781.277s (-0.09%)
Artifact size: 333.81 MiB -> 333.80 MiB (-0.00%)

@rustbot rustbot added the perf-regression Performance regression. label Oct 19, 2024
@lqd
Copy link
Member

lqd commented Oct 19, 2024

The regressions are in rustdoc, so probably #131908.

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 20, 2024
…ime, r=<try>

rustdoc: hash assets at rustdoc build time

Since sha256 is slow enough to show up on small benchmarks, we can save time by embedding the hash in the executable.

Addresses rust-lang#131934 (comment)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. perf-regression Performance regression. rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.