-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Suggest using precise capturing for hidden type that captures region #127619
Suggest using precise capturing for hidden type that captures region #127619
Conversation
| | ||
LL | fn lifetime_in_hidden<'a>(x: &'a ()) -> impl Sized + use<> + 'a { x } | ||
| ++++ | ||
LL | fn lifetime_in_hidden<'a>(x: &'a ()) -> impl Sized + use<'a> { x } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
✨ yay
None, | ||
Some(reg_info.def_id), | ||
) | ||
if infcx.tcx.features().precise_capturing { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Are there other cases where we suggest adding a feature if using nightly? If so, that might be better!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, that could be done, though I think we plan on stabilizing precise capturing soon, so not totally certain about the value. Also, having things gated on "is this a nightly compiler" adds one more weird case that's impossible to test 😅
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
r=me with or without nit if you think it's overkill
Actually I think I'll just open a follow-up that at least leaves a @bors r=oli-obk rollup |
…kingjubilee Rollup of 11 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#126502 (Ignore allocation bytes in some mir-opt tests) - rust-lang#126922 (add lint for inline asm labels that look like binary) - rust-lang#127209 (Added the `xop` target-feature and the `xop_target_feature` feature gate) - rust-lang#127310 (Fix import suggestion ice) - rust-lang#127338 (Migrate `extra-filename-with-temp-outputs` and `issue-85019-moved-src-dir` `run-make` tests to rmake) - rust-lang#127381 (Migrate `issue-83045`, `rustc-macro-dep-files` and `env-dep-info` `run-make` tests to rmake) - rust-lang#127535 (Fire unsafe_code lint on unsafe extern blocks) - rust-lang#127619 (Suggest using precise capturing for hidden type that captures region) - rust-lang#127631 (Remove `fully_normalize`) - rust-lang#127632 (Implement `precise_capturing` support for rustdoc) - rust-lang#127660 (Rename the internal `const_strlen` to just `strlen`) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Rollup merge of rust-lang#127619 - compiler-errors:precise-capturing-better-sugg, r=oli-obk Suggest using precise capturing for hidden type that captures region Adjusts the "add `+ '_`" suggestion for opaques to instead suggest adding or reusing the `+ use<>` in the opaque. r? oli-obk or please re-roll if you're busy!
…better-sugg-apit, r=oli-obk Fix precise capturing suggestion for hidden regions when we have APITs Suggests to turn APITs into type parameters so they can be named in precise capturing syntax for hidden type lifetime errors. We also note that it may change the API. This is currently done via a note *and* a suggestion, which feels a bit redundant, but I wasn't totally sure of a better alternative for the presentation. Code is kind of a mess but there's a lot of cases to consider. Happy to iterate on this if you think the approach is too messy. Based on rust-lang#127619, only the last commit is relevant. r? oli-obk Tracking: - rust-lang#123432
…better-sugg-apit, r=oli-obk Fix precise capturing suggestion for hidden regions when we have APITs Suggests to turn APITs into type parameters so they can be named in precise capturing syntax for hidden type lifetime errors. We also note that it may change the API. This is currently done via a note *and* a suggestion, which feels a bit redundant, but I wasn't totally sure of a better alternative for the presentation. Code is kind of a mess but there's a lot of cases to consider. Happy to iterate on this if you think the approach is too messy. Based on rust-lang#127619, only the last commit is relevant. r? oli-obk Tracking: - rust-lang#123432
Rollup merge of rust-lang#127664 - compiler-errors:precise-capturing-better-sugg-apit, r=oli-obk Fix precise capturing suggestion for hidden regions when we have APITs Suggests to turn APITs into type parameters so they can be named in precise capturing syntax for hidden type lifetime errors. We also note that it may change the API. This is currently done via a note *and* a suggestion, which feels a bit redundant, but I wasn't totally sure of a better alternative for the presentation. Code is kind of a mess but there's a lot of cases to consider. Happy to iterate on this if you think the approach is too messy. Based on rust-lang#127619, only the last commit is relevant. r? oli-obk Tracking: - rust-lang#123432
Adjusts the "add
+ '_
" suggestion for opaques to instead suggest adding or reusing the+ use<>
in the opaque.r? oli-obk or please re-roll if you're busy!
Tracking:
precise_capturing
syntax #123432