-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Wrap Context.ext in AssertUnwindSafe #125392
Merged
bors
merged 1 commit into
rust-lang:master
from
workingjubilee:unwind-a-problem-in-context
May 23, 2024
Merged
Wrap Context.ext in AssertUnwindSafe #125392
bors
merged 1 commit into
rust-lang:master
from
workingjubilee:unwind-a-problem-in-context
May 23, 2024
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
T-libs
Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
labels
May 22, 2024
workingjubilee
force-pushed
the
unwind-a-problem-in-context
branch
from
May 22, 2024 02:05
cb23e9b
to
3a21fb5
Compare
workingjubilee
removed
the
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
label
May 22, 2024
I've added unwind safety as blocker in #123392. The best way to move that forward would be with rust-lang/rfcs#3260. @bors r+ |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
May 22, 2024
Closed
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
May 23, 2024
…iaskrgr Rollup of 8 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#122665 (Add some tests for public-private dependencies.) - rust-lang#123623 (Fix OutsideLoop's error suggestion: adding label `'block` for `if` block.) - rust-lang#125054 (Handle `ReVar` in `note_and_explain_region`) - rust-lang#125156 (Expand `for_loops_over_fallibles` lint to lint on fallibles behind references.) - rust-lang#125222 (Migrate `run-make/issue-46239` to `rmake`) - rust-lang#125316 (Tweak `Spacing` use) - rust-lang#125392 (Wrap Context.ext in AssertUnwindSafe) - rust-lang#125417 (self-contained linker: retry linking without `-fuse-ld=lld` on CCs that don't support it) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
May 23, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#125392 - workingjubilee:unwind-a-problem-in-context, r=Amanieu Wrap Context.ext in AssertUnwindSafe Fixes rust-lang#125193 Alternative to rust-lang#125377 Relevant to rust-lang#123392 I believe this approach is justifiable due to the fact that this function is unstable API and we have been considering trying to dispose of the notion of "unwind safety". Making a more long-term decision should be considered carefully as part of stabilizing `fn ext`, if ever. r? `@Amanieu`
Should this be beta-nominated? #125193 is tagged as a stable-to-beta regression. But I haven't been around a while, and I want to make sure I haven't forgotten anything rather than just nominating myself. |
Amanieu
added
the
beta-nominated
Nominated for backporting to the compiler in the beta channel.
label
May 23, 2024
Amanieu
added
the
beta-accepted
Accepted for backporting to the compiler in the beta channel.
label
May 29, 2024
Merged
cuviper
removed
the
beta-nominated
Nominated for backporting to the compiler in the beta channel.
label
Jun 6, 2024
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 7, 2024
[beta] backports - Fix insufficient logic when searching for the underlying allocation rust-lang#124761 - Handle field projections like slice indexing in invalid_reference_casting rust-lang#124908 - Handle Deref expressions in invalid_reference_casting rust-lang#124978 - Fix ICE in non-operand `aggregate_raw_ptr` instrinsic codegen rust-lang#125184 - Wrap Context.ext in AssertUnwindSafe rust-lang#125392 - Revert problematic opaque type change rust-lang#125489 - ast: Revert a breaking attribute visiting order change rust-lang#125734 - Update to LLVM 18.1.7 rust-lang#126061 r? cuviper
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 7, 2024
[beta] backports - Fix insufficient logic when searching for the underlying allocation rust-lang#124761 - Handle field projections like slice indexing in invalid_reference_casting rust-lang#124908 - Handle Deref expressions in invalid_reference_casting rust-lang#124978 - Fix ICE in non-operand `aggregate_raw_ptr` instrinsic codegen rust-lang#125184 - Wrap Context.ext in AssertUnwindSafe rust-lang#125392 - Revert problematic opaque type change rust-lang#125489 - ast: Revert a breaking attribute visiting order change rust-lang#125734 - Update to LLVM 18.1.7 rust-lang#126061 - Revert "Disallow ambiguous attributes on expressions" on beta rust-lang#126102 / rust-lang#126101 - Silence double-symlink errors while building solaris toolchain rust-lang#126011 r? cuviper
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 7, 2024
[beta] backports - Fix insufficient logic when searching for the underlying allocation rust-lang#124761 - Handle field projections like slice indexing in invalid_reference_casting rust-lang#124908 - Handle Deref expressions in invalid_reference_casting rust-lang#124978 - Fix ICE in non-operand `aggregate_raw_ptr` instrinsic codegen rust-lang#125184 - Wrap Context.ext in AssertUnwindSafe rust-lang#125392 - Revert problematic opaque type change rust-lang#125489 - ast: Revert a breaking attribute visiting order change rust-lang#125734 - Update to LLVM 18.1.7 rust-lang#126061 - Revert "Disallow ambiguous attributes on expressions" on beta rust-lang#126102 / rust-lang#126101 - Silence double-symlink errors while building solaris toolchain rust-lang#126011 r? cuviper
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
beta-accepted
Accepted for backporting to the compiler in the beta channel.
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
T-libs
Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #125193
Alternative to #125377
Relevant to #123392
I believe this approach is justifiable due to the fact that this function is unstable API and we have been considering trying to dispose of the notion of "unwind safety". Making a more long-term decision should be considered carefully as part of stabilizing
fn ext
, if ever.r? @Amanieu