Remove debuginfo from rustc-demangle too

[Mark-Simulacrum]

This is done for the same reason as the other dependencies in this list.

[rustbot]

@Mark-Simulacrum: no appropriate reviewer found, use r? to override

[Mark-Simulacrum]

@bors try @rust-timer queue

[bors]

⌛ Trying commit f946bf4 with merge a89e436...

[bors]

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: a89e436 (a89e43652a9c9664e674f08fa296acba4a3dcf1a)

[bors]

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: a89e436 (a89e43652a9c9664e674f08fa296acba4a3dcf1a)

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (a89e436): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-1.1%	[-2.6%, -0.4%]	9
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-1.2%	[-2.2%, -0.3%]	27
All ❌✅ (primary)	-1.1%	[-2.6%, -0.4%]	9

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	3.4%	[3.1%, 3.7%]	2
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	3.1%	[0.8%, 6.7%]	30
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	3.4%	[3.1%, 3.7%]	2

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-1.8%	[-2.6%, -1.3%]	4
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-1.5%	[-1.9%, -1.3%]	7
All ❌✅ (primary)	-1.8%	[-2.6%, -1.3%]	4

Binary size

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-1.3%	[-3.6%, -0.3%]	16
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-3.3%	[-3.6%, -2.1%]	37
All ❌✅ (primary)	-1.3%	[-3.6%, -0.3%]	16

Bootstrap: 665.855s -> 667.693s (0.28%)
Artifact size: 318.49 MiB -> 318.29 MiB (-0.06%)

[Mark-Simulacrum]

r? @Kobzol perhaps?

[lqd]

r=me (I think Jakub has some vacation this week)

[Kobzol]

I think that it's fine to remove this, hopefully no one is going to debug rustc-demangle in our toolchain. Nice binary size wins.

@bors r+

(My vacation starts tomorrow 😁)

[bors]

📌 Commit f946bf4 has been approved by Kobzol

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit f946bf4 with merge 75fd074...

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: Kobzol
Pushing 75fd074 to master...

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (75fd074): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	0.6%	[0.4%, 0.9%]	4
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-1.6%	[-2.7%, -0.3%]	7
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-1.3%	[-2.4%, -0.3%]	24
All ❌✅ (primary)	-1.6%	[-2.7%, -0.3%]	7

Max RSS (memory usage)

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-1.7%	[-2.0%, -1.4%]	2
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-1.5%	[-1.9%, -0.9%]	11
All ❌✅ (primary)	-1.7%	[-2.0%, -1.4%]	2

Binary size

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-1.3%	[-3.6%, -0.3%]	16
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-3.3%	[-3.6%, -2.0%]	37
All ❌✅ (primary)	-1.3%	[-3.6%, -0.3%]	16

Bootstrap: 666.9s -> 668.863s (0.29%)
Artifact size: 318.48 MiB -> 318.06 MiB (-0.13%)