-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rollup of 10 pull requests #122472
Closed
Closed
Rollup of 10 pull requests #122472
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This means `DiagCtxtInner::emit_diagnostic` can return its result directly, rather than having to modify a local variable.
It has a single call site, and this will enable subsequent refactorings.
It results in a tiny bit of duplication (another `self.treat_next_err_as_bug()` condition) but I think it's worth it to get more code into the main `match`.
This will enable additional refactorings.
Note that `self.suppressed_expected_diag` is no longer set for `ForceWarning`, which is good. Nor is `TRACK_DIAGNOSTIC` called for `Allow`, which is also good.
Also add an assertion for the levels allowed with `has_future_breakage`.
This match is complex enough that it's a good idea to enumerate every variant. This also means `can_be_top_or_sub` can just be `can_be_subdiag`.
Option::map, for example, looks like this: option<t>, (t -> u) -> option<u> This syntax searches all of the HOFs in Rust: traits Fn, FnOnce, and FnMut, and bare fn primitives.
It's going to be a no-op on the empty list anyway (we have plenty of test cases that return nothing) so why send extra code?
Initialize them before the search index is loaded.
This is implemented, in addition to the ML-style one, because Rust does it. If we don't, we'll never hear the end of it. This commit also refactors some duplicate parts of the parser into a dedicated function.
I've been experimenting with transforming the StableMIR to instrument the code with potential UB checks. The modified body will only be used by our analysis tool, however, constants in StableMIR must be backed by rustc constants. Thus, I'm adding a few functions to build constants, such as building string and other primitives.
…g to know the `Machine` type
…t is in fact about validation failures
…iper Add CStr::bytes iterator See rust-lang/libs-team#135 for an ACP. Since rust-lang/libs-team#134 was also accepted, this type is now `core::ffi::c_str::Bytes` instead of `core::ffi::CStrBytes`.
…s, r=ChrisDenton Avoid closing invalid handles Documentation for [`HandleOrInvalid`] has this note: > If holds a handle other than `INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE`, it will close the handle on drop. Documentation for [`HandleOrNull`] has this note: > If this holds a non-null handle, it will close the handle on drop. Currently, both will call `CloseHandle` on their invalid handles as a result of using `OwnedHandle` internally, contradicting the above paragraphs. This PR adds destructors that match the documentation. `@rustbot` label A-io O-windows T-libs [`HandleOrInvalid`]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/os/windows/io/struct.HandleOrInvalid.html [`HandleOrNull`]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/os/windows/io/struct.HandleOrNull.html
…-hof, r=GuillaumeGomez rustdoc-search: search types by higher-order functions This feature extends rustdoc with syntax and search index information for searching function pointers and closures (Higher-Order Functions, or HOF). Part of rust-lang#60485 This PR adds two syntaxes: a high-level one for finding any kind of HOF, and a direct implementation of the parenthesized path syntax that Rust itself uses. ## Preview pages | Query | Results | |-------|---------| | [`option<T>, (fnonce (T) -> bool) -> option<T>`][optionfilter] | `Option::filter` | | [`option<T>, (T -> bool) -> option<T>`][optionfilter2] | `Option::filter` | Updated chapter of the book: https://notriddle.com/rustdoc-html-demo-9/search-hof/rustdoc/read-documentation/search.html [optionfilter]: https://notriddle.com/rustdoc-html-demo-9/search-hof/std/vec/struct.Vec.html?search=option<T>%2C+(fnonce+(T)+->+bool)+->+option<T>&filter-crate=std [optionfilter2]: https://notriddle.com/rustdoc-html-demo-9/search-hof/std/vec/struct.Vec.html?search=option<T>%2C+(T+->+bool)+->+option<T>&filter-crate=std ## Motivation When type-based search was first landed, it was directly [described as incomplete][a comment]. [a comment]: rust-lang#23289 (comment) Filling out the missing functionality is going to mean adding support for more of Rust's [type expression] syntax, such as references, raw pointers, function pointers, and closures. This PR adds function pointers and closures. [type expression]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/types.html#type-expressions There's been demand for something "like Hoogle, but for Rust" expressed a few times [1](https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/y8sbid/is_there_a_website_like_haskells_hoogle_for_rust/) [2](https://users.rust-lang.org/t/rust-equivalent-of-haskells-hoogle/102280) [3](https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/std-library-inclusion-policy/6852/2) [4](https://discord.com/channels/442252698964721669/448238009733742612/1109502307495858216). Some of them just don't realize what functionality already exists ([`Duration -> u64`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/std/?search=duration%20-%3E%20u64) already works), but a lot of them specifically want to search for higher-order functions like option combinators. ## Guide-level explanation (from the Rustdoc book) To search for a function that accepts a function as a parameter, like `Iterator::all`, wrap the nested signature in parenthesis, as in [`Iterator<T>, (T -> bool) -> bool`][iterator-all]. You can also search for a specific closure trait, such as `Iterator<T>, (FnMut(T) -> bool) -> bool`, but you need to know which one you want. [iterator-all]: https://notriddle.com/rustdoc-html-demo-9/search-hof/std/vec/struct.Vec.html?search=Iterator<T>%2C+(T+->+bool)+->+bool&filter-crate=std ## Reference-level description (also from the Rustdoc book) ### Primitives with Special Syntax <table> <thead> <tr> <th>Shorthand</th> <th>Explicit names</th> </tr> </thead> <tbody> <tr><td colspan="2">Before this PR</td></tr> <tr> <td><code>[]</code></td> <td><code>primitive:slice</code> and/or <code>primitive:array</code></td> </tr> <tr> <td><code>[T]</code></td> <td><code>primitive:slice<T></code> and/or <code>primitive:array<T></code></td> </tr> <tr> <td><code>!</code></td> <td><code>primitive:never</code></td> </tr> <tr> <td><code>()</code></td> <td><code>primitive:unit</code> and/or <code>primitive:tuple</code></td> </tr> <tr> <td><code>(T)</code></td> <td><code>T</code></td> </tr> <tr> <td><code>(T,)</code></td> <td><code>primitive:tuple<T></code></td> </tr> <tr><td colspan="2">After this PR</td></tr> <tr> <td><code>(T, U -> V, W)</code></td> <td><code>fn(T, U) -> (V, W)</code>, Fn, FnMut, and FnOnce</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> The `->` operator has lower precedence than comma. If it's not wrapped in brackets, it delimits the return value for the function being searched for. To search for functions that take functions as parameters, use parenthesis. ### Search query grammar ```ebnf ident = *(ALPHA / DIGIT / "_") path = ident *(DOUBLE-COLON ident) [BANG] slice-like = OPEN-SQUARE-BRACKET [ nonempty-arg-list ] CLOSE-SQUARE-BRACKET tuple-like = OPEN-PAREN [ nonempty-arg-list ] CLOSE-PAREN arg = [type-filter *WS COLON *WS] (path [generics] / slice-like / tuple-like) type-sep = COMMA/WS *(COMMA/WS) nonempty-arg-list = *(type-sep) arg *(type-sep arg) *(type-sep) [ return-args ] generic-arg-list = *(type-sep) arg [ EQUAL arg ] *(type-sep arg [ EQUAL arg ]) *(type-sep) normal-generics = OPEN-ANGLE-BRACKET [ generic-arg-list ] *(type-sep) CLOSE-ANGLE-BRACKET fn-like-generics = OPEN-PAREN [ nonempty-arg-list ] CLOSE-PAREN [ RETURN-ARROW arg ] generics = normal-generics / fn-like-generics return-args = RETURN-ARROW *(type-sep) nonempty-arg-list exact-search = [type-filter *WS COLON] [ RETURN-ARROW ] *WS QUOTE ident QUOTE [ generics ] type-search = [ nonempty-arg-list ] query = *WS (exact-search / type-search) *WS ; unchanged parts of the grammar, like the full list of type filters, are omitted ``` ## Future direction ### The remaining type expression grammar As described in rust-lang#118194, this is another step in the type expression grammar: BareFunction, and the function-like mode of TypePath, are now supported. * RawPointerType and ReferenceType actually are a priority. * ImplTraitType and TraitObjectType (and ImplTraitTypeOneBound and TraitObjectTypeOneBound) aren't as much of a priority, since they desugar pretty easily. ### Search subtyping and traits This is the other major factor that makes it less useful than it should be. * `iterator<result<t>> -> result<t>` doesn't find `Result::from_iter`. You have to search [`intoiterator<result<t>> -> result<t>`](https://notriddle.com/rustdoc-html-demo-9/search-hof/std/vec/struct.Vec.html?search=intoiterator%3Cresult%3Ct%3E%3E%20-%3E%20result%3Ct%3E&filter-crate=std). Nobody's going to search for IntoIterator unless they basically already know about it and don't need the search engine anyway. * Iterator combinators are usually structs that happen to implement Iterator, like `std::iter::Map`. To solve these cases, it needs to look at trait implementations, knowing that Iterator is a "subtype of" IntoIterator, and Map is a "subtype of" Iterator, so `iterator -> result` is a subtype of `intoiterator -> result` and `iterator<t>, (t -> u) -> iterator<u>` is a subtype of [`iterator<t>, (t -> u) -> map<t -> u>`](https://notriddle.com/rustdoc-html-demo-9/search-hof/std/vec/struct.Vec.html?search=iterator%3Ct%3E%2C%20(t%20-%3E%20u)%20-%3E%20map%3Ct%20-%3E%20u%3E&filter-crate=std).
…OSTIC-calls, r=oli-obk Document `TRACK_DIAGNOSTIC` calls. r? `````@cjgillot`````
…ywiser Document how removing a type's field can be bad and what to do instead Related to rust-lang#119645
…Jung Various cleanups around the const eval query providers r? `````@RalfJung````` after this, working on running validation before interning starts with swapping the order of two lines of code
Add methods to create StableMIR constant I've been experimenting with transforming the StableMIR to instrument the code with potential UB checks. The modified body will only be used by our analysis tool, however, constants in StableMIR must be backed by rustc constants. Thus, I'm adding a few functions to build constants, such as building string and other primitives. One question I have is whether we should create a global allocation instead for strings. r? ````@oli-obk````
…ind-wf, r=lcnr Fix WF for `AsyncFnKindHelper` in new trait solver `to_opt_closure_kind` ICEs when it sees placeholders... so don't do that no test b/c I'm too lazy to write a no-core test for this, but I could be convinced otherwise r? lcnr
Improve `Step` docs It [came up on urlo](https://users.rust-lang.org/t/implement-trait-step-in-1-76-0/108204?u=cad97) that the unstable reason string isn't helpful, so just remove it; there's nothing meaningful to add here. Also makes a couple drive-by improvements to the method docs -- removes incorrect references, changes `forward_checked`'s invariant formulation to match `backward_checked`'s, and adds a helpful corollary that `step_unchecked(a, 0)` is always safe.
…, r=Amanieu fix unsoundness in Step::forward_unchecked for signed integers Fixes rust-lang#122420 ```rust pub fn foo(a: i8, b: u8) -> i8 { unsafe { a.checked_add_unsigned(b).unwrap_unchecked() } } ``` still compiles down to a single arithmetic instruction ([godbolt](https://rust.godbolt.org/z/qsd3xYWfE)). But we may be losing some loop optimizations if llvm can no longer easily derive that it's a finite counted loop from the no-wrapping flags.
rustbot
added
O-windows
Operating system: Windows
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
T-libs
Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
T-rustdoc
Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
labels
Mar 14, 2024
@bors r+ rollup=never p=10 |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Mar 14, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
O-windows
Operating system: Windows
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
T-libs
Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
T-rustdoc
Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
TRACK_DIAGNOSTIC
calls. #120699 (DocumentTRACK_DIAGNOSTIC
calls.)AsyncFnKindHelper
in new trait solver #122406 (Fix WF forAsyncFnKindHelper
in new trait solver)Step
docs #122421 (ImproveStep
docs)r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup