Rollup of 4 pull requests

[matthiaskrgr]

Successful merges:

• rename 'try' intrinsic to 'catch_unwind' #121598 (rename 'try' intrinsic to 'catch_unwind')
• Update books #121639 (Update books)
• Update Vec and String {from,into}_raw_parts-family docs #121648 (Update Vec and String {from,into}_raw_parts-family docs)
• Properly emit expected ; on #[attr] expr #121651 (Properly emit expected ; on #[attr] expr)

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

[matthiaskrgr]

@bors r+ rollup=never p=4

[bors]

📌 Commit ec5c5b7 has been approved by matthiaskrgr

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit ec5c5b7 with merge 71ffdf7...

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: matthiaskrgr
Pushing 71ffdf7 to master...

[rust-timer]

📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:

PR#	Message	Perf Build Sha
#121598	rename 'try' intrinsic to 'catch_unwind'	c034dd64c83d249cf2fcdcb88bcb63c502e9e344 (link)
#121639	Update books	d5ce3e0f695e7c9647e19c29e5a64c5742bbfe8f (link)
#121648	Update Vec and String {from,into}_raw_parts-family docs	aeee2be504033403a758185cd8c18de911e1211e (link)
#121651	Properly emit expected ; on #[attr] expr	d9e5d74454aaf7fa3b03978da42553dca925dd7c (link)

previous master: 5c786a7fe3

In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: @rust-timer build $SHA

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (71ffdf7): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-0.1%	[-0.2%, -0.1%]	3
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	5.0%	[5.0%, 5.0%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-2.7%	[-4.1%, -1.4%]	4
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	2.6%	[2.6%, 2.6%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 650.825s -> 649.3s (-0.23%)
Artifact size: 311.12 MiB -> 311.08 MiB (-0.01%)