update stdarch #121542
Merged
update stdarch #121542
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
|
@bors r+ |
|
🌲 The tree is currently closed for pull requests below priority 50. This pull request will be tested once the tree is reopened. |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 24, 2024
…iaskrgr Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#121435 (Account for RPITIT in E0310 explicit lifetime constraint suggestion) - rust-lang#121490 (Rustdoc: include crate name in links for local primitives) - rust-lang#121520 (delay cloning of iterator items) - rust-lang#121522 (check that simd_insert/extract indices are in-bounds) - rust-lang#121531 (Ignore less tests in debug builds) - rust-lang#121539 (compiler/rustc_target/src/spec/base/apple/tests.rs: Avoid unnecessary large move) - rust-lang#121542 (update stdarch) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 24, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#121542 - RalfJung:stdarch, r=Amanieu update stdarch r? `@Amanieu`
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 26, 2024
… r=oli-obk remove platform-intrinsics ABI; make SIMD intrinsics be regular intrinsics `@Amanieu` `@workingjubilee` I don't think there is any reason these need to be "special"? The [original RFC](https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/1199-simd-infrastructure.html) indicated eventually making them stable, but I think that is no longer the plan, so seems to me like we can clean this up a bit. Blocked on rust-lang/stdarch#1538, rust-lang#121542.
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
to rust-lang/miri
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 27, 2024
remove platform-intrinsics ABI; make SIMD intrinsics be regular intrinsics `@Amanieu` `@workingjubilee` I don't think there is any reason these need to be "special"? The [original RFC](https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/1199-simd-infrastructure.html) indicated eventually making them stable, but I think that is no longer the plan, so seems to me like we can clean this up a bit. Blocked on rust-lang/stdarch#1538, rust-lang/rust#121542.
bjorn3
pushed a commit
to rust-lang/rustc_codegen_cranelift
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 8, 2024
remove platform-intrinsics ABI; make SIMD intrinsics be regular intrinsics `@Amanieu` `@workingjubilee` I don't think there is any reason these need to be "special"? The [original RFC](https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/1199-simd-infrastructure.html) indicated eventually making them stable, but I think that is no longer the plan, so seems to me like we can clean this up a bit. Blocked on rust-lang/stdarch#1538, rust-lang/rust#121542.
lnicola
pushed a commit
to lnicola/rust-analyzer
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 7, 2024
remove platform-intrinsics ABI; make SIMD intrinsics be regular intrinsics `@Amanieu` `@workingjubilee` I don't think there is any reason these need to be "special"? The [original RFC](https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/1199-simd-infrastructure.html) indicated eventually making them stable, but I think that is no longer the plan, so seems to me like we can clean this up a bit. Blocked on rust-lang/stdarch#1538, rust-lang/rust#121542.
RalfJung
pushed a commit
to RalfJung/rust-analyzer
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 27, 2024
remove platform-intrinsics ABI; make SIMD intrinsics be regular intrinsics `@Amanieu` `@workingjubilee` I don't think there is any reason these need to be "special"? The [original RFC](https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/1199-simd-infrastructure.html) indicated eventually making them stable, but I think that is no longer the plan, so seems to me like we can clean this up a bit. Blocked on rust-lang/stdarch#1538, rust-lang/rust#121542.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
r? @Amanieu