-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
coverage: Avoid unnecessary macros in unit tests #118690
Conversation
These macros don't provide enough value to justify their complexity, when they can just as easily be functions instead.
r? @TaKO8Ki (rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
These commits modify the If this was unintentional then you should revert the changes before this PR is merged. Some changes occurred to MIR optimizations cc @rust-lang/wg-mir-opt |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
indeed, a lot nicer this way
@bors r+ rollup |
…iaskrgr Rollup of 8 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#118505 (Elaborate on ip_addr bit conversion endianness) - rust-lang#118581 (OnceLock: Add note about drop and statics) - rust-lang#118677 ([rustdoc] Fix display of features) - rust-lang#118690 (coverage: Avoid unnecessary macros in unit tests) - rust-lang#118693 (Tell MirUsedCollector that the pointer alignment checks calls its panic symbol) - rust-lang#118695 (coverage: Merge refined spans in a separate final pass) - rust-lang#118709 (fix jobserver GLOBAL_CLIENT_CHECKED uninitialized before use) - rust-lang#118722 (rustdoc: remove unused parameter `reversed` from onEach(Lazy)) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Rollup merge of rust-lang#118690 - Zalathar:test-macros, r=cjgillot coverage: Avoid unnecessary macros in unit tests These macros don't provide enough value to justify their complexity, when they can just as easily be functions instead. --- `@rustbot` label +A-code-coverage
These macros don't provide enough value to justify their complexity, when they can just as easily be functions instead.
@rustbot label +A-code-coverage