Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

coverage: Avoid unnecessary macros in unit tests #118690

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 8, 2023

Conversation

Zalathar
Copy link
Contributor

@Zalathar Zalathar commented Dec 7, 2023

These macros don't provide enough value to justify their complexity, when they can just as easily be functions instead.


@rustbot label +A-code-coverage

These macros don't provide enough value to justify their complexity, when they
can just as easily be functions instead.
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Dec 7, 2023

r? @TaKO8Ki

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Dec 7, 2023
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Dec 7, 2023

These commits modify the Cargo.lock file. Unintentional changes to Cargo.lock can be introduced when switching branches and rebasing PRs.

If this was unintentional then you should revert the changes before this PR is merged.
Otherwise, you can ignore this comment.

Some changes occurred to MIR optimizations

cc @rust-lang/wg-mir-opt

@rustbot rustbot added the A-code-coverage Area: Source-based code coverage (-Cinstrument-coverage) label Dec 7, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@Swatinem Swatinem left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

indeed, a lot nicer this way

@cjgillot
Copy link
Contributor

cjgillot commented Dec 7, 2023

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 7, 2023

📌 Commit 47e6e5e has been approved by cjgillot

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Dec 7, 2023
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 8, 2023
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#118505 (Elaborate on ip_addr bit conversion endianness)
 - rust-lang#118581 (OnceLock: Add note about drop and statics)
 - rust-lang#118677 ([rustdoc] Fix display of features)
 - rust-lang#118690 (coverage: Avoid unnecessary macros in unit tests)
 - rust-lang#118693 (Tell MirUsedCollector that the pointer alignment checks calls its panic symbol)
 - rust-lang#118695 (coverage: Merge refined spans in a separate final pass)
 - rust-lang#118709 (fix jobserver GLOBAL_CLIENT_CHECKED uninitialized before use)
 - rust-lang#118722 (rustdoc: remove unused parameter `reversed` from onEach(Lazy))

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 0c121b5 into rust-lang:master Dec 8, 2023
11 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.76.0 milestone Dec 8, 2023
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 8, 2023
Rollup merge of rust-lang#118690 - Zalathar:test-macros, r=cjgillot

coverage: Avoid unnecessary macros in unit tests

These macros don't provide enough value to justify their complexity, when they can just as easily be functions instead.

---

`@rustbot` label +A-code-coverage
@Zalathar Zalathar deleted the test-macros branch December 8, 2023 10:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-code-coverage Area: Source-based code coverage (-Cinstrument-coverage) S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants