Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use usize::repeat_u8 instead of implementing repeat_byte in memchr.rs #118315

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 29, 2023

Conversation

WaffleLapkin
Copy link
Member

It's simpler that way and the tricks don't actually make a difference: https://godbolt.org/z/zrvYY1dGx

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Nov 26, 2023

r? @m-ou-se

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Nov 26, 2023
@m-ou-se
Copy link
Member

m-ou-se commented Nov 28, 2023

@bors r+ rollup=never

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 28, 2023

📌 Commit 234e950 has been approved by m-ou-se

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Nov 28, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 28, 2023

⌛ Testing commit 234e950 with merge 896f7bf...

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 28, 2023
…ou-se

Use `usize::repeat_u8` instead of implementing `repeat_byte` in `memchr.rs`

It's simpler that way and the tricks don't actually make a difference: https://godbolt.org/z/zrvYY1dGx
@rust-log-analyzer
Copy link
Collaborator

The job x86_64-mingw failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
failures:

---- [rustdoc] tests\rustdoc\intra-doc\builtin-macros.rs stdout ----

error: rustdoc failed!
status: exit code: 0xc00000fd
command: PATH="C:\a\rust\rust\build\x86_64-pc-windows-gnu\stage2\bin;C:\a\rust\rust\build\x86_64-pc-windows-gnu\stage0-bootstrap-tools\x86_64-pc-windows-gnu\release\deps;C:\a\rust\rust\build\x86_64-pc-windows-gnu\stage0\bin;C:\a\rust\rust\ninja;C:\a\rust\rust\mingw64\bin;C:\hostedtoolcache\windows\Python\3.12.0\x64\Scripts;C:\hostedtoolcache\windows\Python\3.12.0\x64;C:\msys64\usr\bin;C:\a\rust\rust\sccache;C:\PROGRA~1\MongoDB\bin;C:\aliyun-cli;C:\vcpkg;C:\cf-cli;C:\Program Files (x86)\NSIS;C:\tools\zstd;C:\Program Files\Mercurial;C:\hostedtoolcache\windows\stack\2.13.1\x64;C:\cabal\bin;C:\ghcup\bin;C:\mingw64\bin;C:\Program Files\dotnet;C:\Program Files\MySQL\MySQL Server 5.7\bin;C:\Program Files\R\R-4.3.2\bin\x64;C:\SeleniumWebDrivers\GeckoDriver;C:\Program Files (x86)\sbt\bin;C:\Program Files (x86)\GitHub CLI;C:\Program Files\Git\bin;C:\Program Files (x86)\pipx_bin;C:\npm\prefix;C:\hostedtoolcache\windows\go\1.20.11\x64\bin;C:\hostedtoolcache\windows\Python\3.7.9\x64\Scripts;C:\hostedtoolcache\windows\Python\3.7.9\x64;C:\hostedtoolcache\windows\Ruby\2.5.9\x64\bin;C:\Program Files\OpenSSL\bin;C:\tools\kotlinc\bin;C:\hostedtoolcache\windows\Java_Temurin-Hotspot_jdk\8.0.392-8\x64\bin;C:\Program Files\ImageMagick-7.1.1-Q16-HDRI;C:\Program Files\Microsoft SDKs\Azure\CLI2\wbin;C:\ProgramData\kind;C:\Program Files\Eclipse Foundation\jdk-8.0.302.8-hotspot\bin;C:\Windows\system32;C:\Windows;C:\Windows\System32\Wbem;C:\Windows\System32\WindowsPowerShell\v1.0;C:\Windows\System32\OpenSSH;C:\ProgramData\Chocolatey\bin;C:\Program Files\PowerShell\7;C:\Program Files\Microsoft\Web Platform Installer;C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\130\Tools\Binn;C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\Client SDK\ODBC\170\Tools\Binn;C:\Program Files (x86)\Windows Kits\10\Windows Performance Toolkit;C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft SQL Server\110\DTS\Binn;C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft SQL Server\120\DTS\Binn;C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft SQL Server\130\DTS\Binn;C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft SQL Server\140\DTS\Binn;C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft SQL Server\150\DTS\Binn;C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft SQL Server\160\DTS\Binn;C:\Strawberry\c\bin;C:\Strawberry\perl\site\bin;C:\Strawberry\perl\bin;C:\ProgramData\chocolatey\lib\pulumi\tools\Pulumi\bin;C:\Program Files\TortoiseSVN\bin;C:\Program Files\CMake\bin;C:\ProgramData\chocolatey\lib\maven\apache-maven-3.8.7\bin;C:\Program Files\Microsoft Service Fabric\bin\Fabric\Fabric.Code;C:\Program Files\Microsoft SDKs\Service Fabric\Tools\ServiceFabricLocalClusterManager;C:\Program Files\nodejs;C:\Program Files\Git\cmd;C:\Program Files\Git\mingw64\bin;C:\Program Files\Git\usr\bin;C:\Program Files\GitHub CLI;C:\tools\php;C:\Program Files (x86)\sbt\bin;C:\SeleniumWebDrivers\ChromeDriver;C:\SeleniumWebDrivers\EdgeDriver;C:\Program Files\Amazon\AWSCLIV2;C:\Program Files\Amazon\SessionManagerPlugin\bin;C:\Program Files\Amazon\AWSSAMCLI\bin;C:\Program Files (x86)\Google\Cloud SDK\google-cloud-sdk\bin;C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft BizTalk Server;C:\Program Files\LLVM\bin;C:\Users\runneradmin\.dotnet\tools;C:\Users\runneradmin\.cargo\bin;C:\Users\runneradmin\AppData\Local\Microsoft\WindowsApps" "C:\\a\\rust\\rust\\build\\x86_64-pc-windows-gnu\\stage2\\bin\\rustdoc.exe" "-L" "C:\\a\\rust\\rust\\build\\x86_64-pc-windows-gnu\\stage2\\lib\\rustlib\\x86_64-pc-windows-gnu\\lib" "-L" "C:\\a\\rust\\rust\\build\\x86_64-pc-windows-gnu\\test\\rustdoc\\intra-doc\\builtin-macros\\auxiliary" "-o" "C:\\a\\rust\\rust\\build\\x86_64-pc-windows-gnu\\test\\rustdoc\\intra-doc\\builtin-macros" "--deny" "warnings" "C:\\a\\rust\\rust\\tests\\rustdoc\\intra-doc\\builtin-macros.rs" "-A" "internal_features"
--- stderr -------------------------------

thread 'main' has overflowed its stack
------------------------------------------

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 28, 2023

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Nov 28, 2023
@WaffleLapkin
Copy link
Member Author

error: rustdoc failed!
...
thread 'main' has overflowed its stack

Looks spurious.
@bors retry

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Nov 29, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 29, 2023

⌛ Testing commit 234e950 with merge abe34e9...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 29, 2023

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: m-ou-se
Pushing abe34e9 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Nov 29, 2023
@bors bors merged commit abe34e9 into rust-lang:master Nov 29, 2023
12 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.76.0 milestone Nov 29, 2023
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (abe34e9): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌ regressions - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
0.1% [0.1%, 0.1%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
5.1% [5.1%, 5.1%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-3.7% [-3.7%, -3.7%] 1
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-2.3% [-2.3%, -2.3%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) -3.7% [-3.7%, -3.7%] 1

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 672.005s -> 673.033s (0.15%)
Artifact size: 313.36 MiB -> 313.38 MiB (0.01%)

@WaffleLapkin WaffleLapkin deleted the don't-repeat_byte branch November 29, 2023 20:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants