Add missing entries in 1.74 release notes

[slanterns]

No description provided.

[rustbot]

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

[Mark-Simulacrum]

Hm I thought I had rebased over those changes in the previous PR, but I suppose not.

@bors r+

[bors]

📌 Commit 7f10299 has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[Mark-Simulacrum]

@bors p=1

[slanterns]

@Mark-Simulacrum Caught a small tidy fix. Please take a look again ^_^

[Mark-Simulacrum]

@bors r+

[bors]

📌 Commit 563d975 has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit 563d975 with merge cc8681b...

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: Mark-Simulacrum
Pushing cc8681b to master...

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (cc8681b): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	0.4%	[0.4%, 0.4%]	1
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	2.2%	[2.2%, 2.2%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-1.0%	[-1.7%, -0.4%]	4
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-3.7%	[-3.7%, -3.7%]	1
All ❌✅ (primary)	-0.7%	[-1.7%, 0.4%]	5

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	0.4%	[0.4%, 0.4%]	1
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	0.4%	[0.4%, 0.4%]	1

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 676.301s -> 674.399s (-0.28%)
Artifact size: 311.10 MiB -> 311.08 MiB (-0.00%)