-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Relate alias ty with variance #116219
Relate alias ty with variance #116219
Conversation
@bors try @rust-timer queue |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
…-variance, r=<try> Relate alias ty with variance In the new solver, turns out that the subst-relate branch of the alias-relate predicate was relating args invariantly even for opaques, which have variance 💀. This change is a bit more invasive, but I'd rather not special-case it [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/aeaa5c30e5c9041264a2e8314b68ad84c2dc3169/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/solve/alias_relate.rs#L171-L190) and then have it break elsewhere. r? `@lcnr`
e32b697
to
f310e3c
Compare
This comment was marked as duplicate.
This comment was marked as duplicate.
1 similar comment
@bors try |
…-variance, r=<try> Relate alias ty with variance In the new solver, turns out that the subst-relate branch of the alias-relate predicate was relating args invariantly even for opaques, which have variance 💀. This change is a bit more invasive, but I'd rather not special-case it [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/aeaa5c30e5c9041264a2e8314b68ad84c2dc3169/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/solve/alias_relate.rs#L171-L190) and then have it break elsewhere. r? `@lcnr`
…-variance, r=<try> Relate alias ty with variance In the new solver, turns out that the subst-relate branch of the alias-relate predicate was relating args invariantly even for opaques, which have variance 💀. This change is a bit more invasive, but I'd rather not special-case it [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/aeaa5c30e5c9041264a2e8314b68ad84c2dc3169/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/solve/alias_relate.rs#L171-L190) and then have it break elsewhere. r? `@lcnr`
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
b.args, | ||
false, // do not fetch `type_of(a_def_id)`, as it will cause a cycle | ||
)?, | ||
DefKind::AssocTy | DefKind::AssocConst | DefKind::TyAlias => { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What about lazy type aliases? Shouldn't they be related with variances, too?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I considered this, but it shouldn't matter in practice, since they're always normalizable.
This only really concerns things that must be considered as aliases.
☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Finished benchmarking commit (2e44f1a): comparison URL. Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - ACTION NEEDEDBenchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf. Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this try perf run, please indicate this with @bors rollup=never Instruction countThis is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Max RSS (memory usage)ResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
CyclesThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Binary sizeThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Bootstrap: 631.947s -> 631.255s (-0.11%) |
@@ -273,7 +274,20 @@ impl<'tcx> Relate<'tcx> for ty::AliasTy<'tcx> { | |||
if a.def_id != b.def_id { | |||
Err(TypeError::ProjectionMismatched(expected_found(relation, a.def_id, b.def_id))) | |||
} else { | |||
let args = relation.relate(a.args, b.args)?; | |||
let args = match relation.tcx().def_kind(a.def_id) { | |||
DefKind::OpaqueTy => relate_args_with_variances( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
shouldn't it be fine to use variances_of
for all other aliases as well? at this point you could use relation.relate_item_args
which avoids any lookup in Equate
(and needs to call variances_of
regardless if we're not in Equate
)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think variances_of is impl'd for projections. I guess I could impl it, but that may have other perf implications.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
hmm, alternatively, instead of using the DefKind
, have the Ty::relate
provide the AliasKind
to the substs relate.
do we need ProjectionTy
to implement Relate
itself, or would an inherent method relate
which also takes the AliasKind
be possible?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
do we need ProjectionTy to implement Relate itself, or would an inherent method relate which also takes the AliasKind be possible?
This is pretty difficult, because in order to invoke a relation, you need something that implements Self: ToTrace
. That requires Self: Relate
. I guess I could poke a hole through with something like trace
, but even then, it doesn't seem really ergonomic. Or I could separate out ToTrace
from Relate
or something...
This also makes this code significantly uglier:
rust/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/solve/alias_relate.rs
Lines 171 to 190 in 56ada88
fn assemble_subst_relate_candidate( | |
&mut self, | |
param_env: ty::ParamEnv<'tcx>, | |
alias_lhs: ty::AliasTy<'tcx>, | |
alias_rhs: ty::AliasTy<'tcx>, | |
direction: ty::AliasRelationDirection, | |
) -> QueryResult<'tcx> { | |
self.probe_misc_candidate("args relate").enter(|ecx| { | |
match direction { | |
ty::AliasRelationDirection::Equate => { | |
ecx.eq(param_env, alias_lhs, alias_rhs)?; | |
} | |
ty::AliasRelationDirection::Subtype => { | |
ecx.sub(param_env, alias_lhs, alias_rhs)?; | |
} | |
} | |
ecx.evaluate_added_goals_and_make_canonical_response(Certainty::Yes) | |
}) | |
} |
Since we can't just use the generic eq
and sub
methods on EvalCtxt
.
I'm somewhat skeptical of the perf regression, but maybe it's real? Diesel looks spiky recently. |
f310e3c
to
be29d22
Compare
Rebased and testing again @bors try @rust-timer queue |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
…-variance, r=<try> Relate alias ty with variance In the new solver, turns out that the subst-relate branch of the alias-relate predicate was relating args invariantly even for opaques, which have variance 💀. This change is a bit more invasive, but I'd rather not special-case it [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/aeaa5c30e5c9041264a2e8314b68ad84c2dc3169/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/solve/alias_relate.rs#L171-L190) and then have it break elsewhere. I'm doing a perf run to see if the extra call to `def_kind` is that expensive, if it is, I'll reconsider. r? `@lcnr`
☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Finished benchmarking commit (0027216): comparison URL. Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action neededBenchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf. @bors rollup=never Instruction countThis is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Max RSS (memory usage)This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. CyclesResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Binary sizeThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Bootstrap: 622.307s -> 623.821s (0.24%) |
@bors r+ rollup (new solver) |
…th-variance, r=lcnr Relate alias ty with variance In the new solver, turns out that the subst-relate branch of the alias-relate predicate was relating args invariantly even for opaques, which have variance 💀. This change is a bit more invasive, but I'd rather not special-case it [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/aeaa5c30e5c9041264a2e8314b68ad84c2dc3169/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/solve/alias_relate.rs#L171-L190) and then have it break elsewhere. I'm doing a perf run to see if the extra call to `def_kind` is that expensive, if it is, I'll reconsider. r? `@lcnr`
…iaskrgr Rollup of 5 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#116219 (Relate alias ty with variance) - rust-lang#116315 (Do not check for impossible predicates in const-prop lint.) - rust-lang#116436 (Structurally normalize for closure) - rust-lang#116597 (Prevent showing methods from blanket impls of not available foreign traits to show up in the search results) - rust-lang#116627 (small cleanup) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Rollup merge of rust-lang#116219 - compiler-errors:relate-alias-ty-with-variance, r=lcnr Relate alias ty with variance In the new solver, turns out that the subst-relate branch of the alias-relate predicate was relating args invariantly even for opaques, which have variance 💀. This change is a bit more invasive, but I'd rather not special-case it [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/aeaa5c30e5c9041264a2e8314b68ad84c2dc3169/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/solve/alias_relate.rs#L171-L190) and then have it break elsewhere. I'm doing a perf run to see if the extra call to `def_kind` is that expensive, if it is, I'll reconsider. r? ``@lcnr``
48: Pull upstream master 2023 10 12 r=tshepang a=Dajamante * rust-lang/rust#113487 * rust-lang/rust#116506 * rust-lang/rust#116448 * rust-lang/rust#116640 * rust-lang/rust#116627 * rust-lang/rust#116597 * rust-lang/rust#116436 * rust-lang/rust#116315 * rust-lang/rust#116219 * rust-lang/rust#113218 * rust-lang/rust#115937 * rust-lang/rust#116014 * rust-lang/rust#116623 * rust-lang/rust#112818 * rust-lang/rust#115948 * rust-lang/rust#116622 * rust-lang/rust#116621 * rust-lang/rust#116612 * rust-lang/rust#116611 * rust-lang/rust#116530 * rust-lang/rust#95967 * rust-lang/rust#116578 * rust-lang/rust#113915 * rust-lang/rust#116605 * rust-lang/rust#116574 * rust-lang/rust#116560 * rust-lang/rust#116559 * rust-lang/rust#116503 * rust-lang/rust#116444 * rust-lang/rust#116250 * rust-lang/rust#109422 * rust-lang/rust#116598 * rust-lang/rust#116596 * rust-lang/rust#116595 * rust-lang/rust#116589 * rust-lang/rust#116586 * rust-lang/rust#116551 * rust-lang/rust#116409 * rust-lang/rust#116548 * rust-lang/rust#116366 * rust-lang/rust#109882 * rust-lang/rust#116497 * rust-lang/rust#116532 * rust-lang/rust#116569 * rust-lang/rust#116561 * rust-lang/rust#116556 * rust-lang/rust#116549 * rust-lang/rust#116543 * rust-lang/rust#116537 * rust-lang/rust#115882 * rust-lang/rust#116142 * rust-lang/rust#115238 * rust-lang/rust#116533 * rust-lang/rust#116096 * rust-lang/rust#116468 * rust-lang/rust#116515 * rust-lang/rust#116454 * rust-lang/rust#116183 * rust-lang/rust#116514 * rust-lang/rust#116509 * rust-lang/rust#116487 * rust-lang/rust#116486 * rust-lang/rust#116450 * rust-lang/rust#114623 * rust-lang/rust#116416 * rust-lang/rust#116437 * rust-lang/rust#100806 * rust-lang/rust#116330 * rust-lang/rust#116310 * rust-lang/rust#115583 * rust-lang/rust#116457 * rust-lang/rust#116508 * rust-lang/rust#109214 * rust-lang/rust#116318 * rust-lang/rust#116501 * rust-lang/rust#116500 * rust-lang/rust#116458 * rust-lang/rust#116400 * rust-lang/rust#116277 * rust-lang/rust#114709 * rust-lang/rust#116492 * rust-lang/rust#116484 * rust-lang/rust#116481 * rust-lang/rust#116474 * rust-lang/rust#116466 * rust-lang/rust#116423 * rust-lang/rust#116297 * rust-lang/rust#114564 * rust-lang/rust#114811 * rust-lang/rust#116489 * rust-lang/rust#115304 Co-authored-by: Peter Hall <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Emanuele Vannacci <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Neven Villani <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Alex Macleod <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Tamir Duberstein <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Eduardo Sánchez Muñoz <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: koka <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: bors <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Philipp Krones <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Camille GILLOT <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Esteban Küber <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Ralf Jung <[email protected]>
48: Pull upstream master 2023 10 12 r=tshepang a=Dajamante * rust-lang/rust#113487 * rust-lang/rust#116506 * rust-lang/rust#116448 * rust-lang/rust#116640 * rust-lang/rust#116627 * rust-lang/rust#116597 * rust-lang/rust#116436 * rust-lang/rust#116315 * rust-lang/rust#116219 * rust-lang/rust#113218 * rust-lang/rust#115937 * rust-lang/rust#116014 * rust-lang/rust#116623 * rust-lang/rust#112818 * rust-lang/rust#115948 * rust-lang/rust#116622 * rust-lang/rust#116621 * rust-lang/rust#116612 * rust-lang/rust#116611 * rust-lang/rust#116530 * rust-lang/rust#95967 * rust-lang/rust#116578 * rust-lang/rust#113915 * rust-lang/rust#116605 * rust-lang/rust#116574 * rust-lang/rust#116560 * rust-lang/rust#116559 * rust-lang/rust#116503 * rust-lang/rust#116444 * rust-lang/rust#116250 * rust-lang/rust#109422 * rust-lang/rust#116598 * rust-lang/rust#116596 * rust-lang/rust#116595 * rust-lang/rust#116589 * rust-lang/rust#116586 * rust-lang/rust#116551 * rust-lang/rust#116409 * rust-lang/rust#116548 * rust-lang/rust#116366 * rust-lang/rust#109882 * rust-lang/rust#116497 * rust-lang/rust#116532 * rust-lang/rust#116569 * rust-lang/rust#116561 * rust-lang/rust#116556 * rust-lang/rust#116549 * rust-lang/rust#116543 * rust-lang/rust#116537 * rust-lang/rust#115882 * rust-lang/rust#116142 * rust-lang/rust#115238 * rust-lang/rust#116533 * rust-lang/rust#116096 * rust-lang/rust#116468 * rust-lang/rust#116515 * rust-lang/rust#116454 * rust-lang/rust#116183 * rust-lang/rust#116514 * rust-lang/rust#116509 * rust-lang/rust#116487 * rust-lang/rust#116486 * rust-lang/rust#116450 * rust-lang/rust#114623 * rust-lang/rust#116416 * rust-lang/rust#116437 * rust-lang/rust#100806 * rust-lang/rust#116330 * rust-lang/rust#116310 * rust-lang/rust#115583 * rust-lang/rust#116457 * rust-lang/rust#116508 * rust-lang/rust#109214 * rust-lang/rust#116318 * rust-lang/rust#116501 * rust-lang/rust#116500 * rust-lang/rust#116458 * rust-lang/rust#116400 * rust-lang/rust#116277 * rust-lang/rust#114709 * rust-lang/rust#116492 * rust-lang/rust#116484 * rust-lang/rust#116481 * rust-lang/rust#116474 * rust-lang/rust#116466 * rust-lang/rust#116423 * rust-lang/rust#116297 * rust-lang/rust#114564 * rust-lang/rust#114811 * rust-lang/rust#116489 * rust-lang/rust#115304 Co-authored-by: Emanuele Vannacci <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Neven Villani <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Alex Macleod <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Tamir Duberstein <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Eduardo Sánchez Muñoz <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: koka <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: bors <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Philipp Krones <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Camille GILLOT <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Esteban Küber <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Ralf Jung <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: ShE3py <[email protected]>
In the new solver, turns out that the subst-relate branch of the alias-relate predicate was relating args invariantly even for opaques, which have variance 💀.
This change is a bit more invasive, but I'd rather not special-case it here and then have it break elsewhere. I'm doing a perf run to see if the extra call to
def_kind
is that expensive, if it is, I'll reconsider.r? @lcnr