rustdoc: Rename typedef to type alias

[camelid]

This matches the name used by the Rust Reference, which is also what
people usually call these items.

r? @GuillaumeGomez

[rustbot]

Some changes occurred in HTML/CSS/JS.

cc @GuillaumeGomez, @jsha

rustdoc-json-types is a public (although nightly-only) API. If possible, consider changing src/librustdoc/json/conversions.rs; otherwise, make sure you bump the FORMAT_VERSION constant.

cc @CraftSpider, @aDotInTheVoid, @Enselic, @obi1kenobi

[GuillaumeGomez]

Thanks!

r=me once CI pass

[rustbot]

Some changes occurred in GUI tests.

cc @GuillaumeGomez

[aDotInTheVoid]

Looks good WRT Rustdoc-JSON couple of naming nits to keeps the tools consistant with the lib. Running a find and replace of inner.typedef to inner.type_alias should fix most of the rustdoc-json tests.

[aDotInTheVoid]

@bors r=aDotInTheVoid,GuillaumeGomez

[bors]

📌 Commit 912d11d has been approved by aDotInTheVoid,GuillaumeGomez

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit 912d11d with merge 9bd60a6...

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: aDotInTheVoid,GuillaumeGomez
Pushing 9bd60a6 to master...

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (9bd60a6): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	1.0%	[1.0%, 1.0%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-1.8%	[-2.4%, -1.4%]	3
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 632.475s -> 631.241s (-0.20%)
Artifact size: 346.61 MiB -> 346.61 MiB (-0.00%)

[jdahlstrom]

Just wanted to say thanks :D The use of a wrong term bothered me a while ago but not enough to create an issue right away. Now I thought I'd finally create one, but when I double-checked the docs it was already fixed 👍