Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

proc_macro: Update docs for Spacing #114617

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 16, 2023
Merged

Conversation

petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor

Brings the docs more in line with reality

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Aug 8, 2023

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Aug 8, 2023
@petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor Author

cc @nnethercote

Copy link
Member

@Mark-Simulacrum Mark-Simulacrum left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

r=me modulo compatibility nit

library/proc_macro/src/lib.rs Show resolved Hide resolved
@petrochenkov petrochenkov added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Aug 14, 2023
Brings the docs more in line with reality
@petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor Author

@bors r=Mark-Simulacrum

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 16, 2023

📌 Commit 176a939 has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Aug 16, 2023
GuillaumeGomez added a commit to GuillaumeGomez/rust that referenced this pull request Aug 16, 2023
…mulacrum

proc_macro: Update docs for `Spacing`

Brings the docs more in line with reality
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Aug 16, 2023
…mulacrum

proc_macro: Update docs for `Spacing`

Brings the docs more in line with reality
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 16, 2023

⌛ Testing commit 176a939 with merge ce01f4d...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 16, 2023

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: Mark-Simulacrum
Pushing ce01f4d to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Aug 16, 2023
@bors bors merged commit ce01f4d into rust-lang:master Aug 16, 2023
11 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.73.0 milestone Aug 16, 2023
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (ce01f4d): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
2.0% [2.0%, 2.0%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 634.344s -> 635.164s (0.13%)
Artifact size: 346.74 MiB -> 346.71 MiB (-0.01%)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants