-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Sync portable-simd to 2023 May 10 #111475
Conversation
…k layout This makes it more clear that you can't rely on the layout of these, which seems worth doing given that the names vaguely suggest that you can (and the docs only clarify that you can't on Mask but not the maskNxM aliases).
make some Miri backtraces more pretty
Fix interleave/deinterleave for vectors with only one lane
add all_lane_counts feature to enable non-power-of-2 lane counts <= 64
couldn't run the `hellosimd` without it 🤷🏾
Co-authored-by: Jacob Lifshay <[email protected]>
Mark more mask functions inline
Update readme
Specify aliases in one place, and make it more uniform which are defined
🌲 The tree is currently closed for pull requests below priority 100. This pull request will be tested once the tree is reopened. |
@bors p=101 |
⌛ Testing commit de858e7 with merge c5f6f5892836916d1778cdae4ef9d0c87ab16693... |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
Ah right. |
@bors r+ |
@bors p=1 (tree is open, bumping priority to a normal value in case it fails again and needs to be retried) |
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
Finished benchmarking commit (26e0c57): comparison URL. Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed@rustbot label: -perf-regression Instruction countThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Max RSS (memory usage)ResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
CyclesThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Binary sizeThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Bootstrap: 661.63s -> 660.274s (-0.20%) |
Take 2.
r? @ghost