Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 5 pull requests #110735

Closed
wants to merge 25 commits into from

Conversation

matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

clubby789 and others added 25 commits April 17, 2023 13:01
- Use `cargo metadata` to determine whether a crate has a library
  package or not
- Collect metadata for all workspaces, not just the root workspace and
  cargo
- Don't pass `--lib` for crates without a library
- Use `run_cargo_test` for rust-installer
- Don't build documentation in `lint-docs` if `--no-doc` is passed
…jackh726

Suggest using integration tests for test crate using own proc-macro

cc rust-lang#110247
…unsound-issues, r=jackh726

Add `known-bug` tests for 11 unsound issues

r? `@jackh726`

Should tests for other issues be in separate PRs?  Thanks.

Edit: Partially addresses rust-lang#105107.  This PR adds `known-bug` tests for 11 unsound issues:
- rust-lang#25860
- rust-lang#49206
- rust-lang#57893
- rust-lang#84366
- rust-lang#84533
- rust-lang#84591
- rust-lang#85099
- rust-lang#98117
- rust-lang#100041
- rust-lang#100051
- rust-lang#104005
…levant_impl, r=b-naber

Remove `find_map_relevant_impl`

Fixes rust-lang#108895
bootstrap: Unify test argument handling

Fixes rust-lang#104198. Does *not* help with rust-lang#80124 because I couldn't figure out a reasonable way to omit `--lib` only for `panic_abort` and not other `std` dependencies.

- Remove unnecessary `test_kind` field and `TestKind` struct. These are just subsets of the existing `builder.kind` / `Kind` struct.
- Add a new `run_cargo_test` function which handles passing arguments to cargo based on `builder.config`
- Switch all Steps in `mod test` to `run_cargo_test` where possible
- Combine several steps into one `CrateBootstrap` step. These tests all do the same thing, just with different crate names.
- Fix `x test --no-doc`. This is much simpler after the refactors mentioned earlier, but I'm happy to split it into a separate PR if desired. Before, this would panic a lot because steps forgot to pass `--lib`.
…=jackh726

Add some tests around (lack of) object safety of associated types and consts

See https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/144729-t-types/topic/.60where.20Self.3ASized.60.20on.20assoc.20types/near/351260928 for some discussion around why this isn't allowed.

We didn't have any tests for these, so I decided to add them now, even if we don't end up doing anything about it.
@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. WG-trait-system-refactor The Rustc Trait System Refactor Initiative (-Znext-solver) labels Apr 23, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added the rollup A PR which is a rollup label Apr 23, 2023
@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=6

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 23, 2023

📌 Commit 566b88e has been approved by matthiaskrgr

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Apr 23, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 23, 2023

⌛ Testing commit 566b88e with merge cba66f9e7de500d13c088e5f756c4d395e35868e...

@rust-log-analyzer
Copy link
Collaborator

A job failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)

@matthiaskrgr matthiaskrgr deleted the rollup-b4m88y0 branch March 16, 2024 18:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. WG-trait-system-refactor The Rustc Trait System Refactor Initiative (-Znext-solver)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants