-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rollup of 7 pull requests #108600
Closed
Closed
Rollup of 7 pull requests #108600
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
instead of the span of the token after the semicolon
The extra query is unnecessary in the common case of not having fuel.
Co-Authored-By: GuillaumeGomez <[email protected]>
Nothing actually produces it in this commit.
This trait was a way to generalize over both `TyCtxt` and `Resolver`, but now `Resolver` has access to `TyCtxt`, so this trait is no longer necessary.
This adds the following functions: * `Option<T>::as_slice(&self) -> &[T]` * `Option<T>::as_slice_mut(&mut self) -> &[T]` The `as_slice` and `as_slice_mut` functions benefit from an optimization that makes them completely branch-free. Note that the optimization's soundness hinges on the fact that either the niche optimization makes the offset of the `Some(_)` contents zero or the mempory layout of `Option<T>` is equal to that of `Option<MaybeUninit<T>>`.
Add `Option::as_`(`mut_`)`slice` This adds the following functions: * `Option<T>::as_slice(&self) -> &[T]` * `Option<T>::as_mut_slice(&mut self) -> &[T]` The `as_slice` and `as_mut_slice_mut` functions benefit from an optimization that makes them completely branch-free. ~~Unfortunately, this optimization is not available on by-value Options, therefore the `into_slice` implementations use the plain `match` + `slice::from_ref` approach.~~ Note that the optimization's soundness hinges on the fact that either the niche optimization makes the offset of the `Some(_)` contents zero or the mempory layout of `Option<T>` is equal to that of `Option<MaybeUninit<T>>`. The idea has been discussed on [Zulip](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/219381-t-libs/topic/Option.3A.3Aas_slice). Notably the idea for the `as_slice_mut` and `into_slice´ methods came from `@cuviper` and `@Sp00ph` hardened the optimization against niche-optimized Options. The [rust playground](https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=nightly&mode=release&edition=2021&gist=74f8e4239a19f454c183aaf7b4a969e0) shows that the generated assembly of the optimized method is basically only a copy while the naive method generates code containing a `test dx, dx` on x86_64. --- EDIT from reviewer: ACP is rust-lang/libs-team#150
…tion-macro, r=GuillaumeGomez rustdoc: search by macro when query ends with `!` Related to rust-lang#96399 Note: the `never` type alias is tested in [`/tests/rustdoc-js-std/alias-3.js`](https://github.com/notriddle/rust/blob/08ad401633037cc226b3806a3c5f48c2f34703bf/tests/rustdoc-js-std/alias-3.js) ## Before ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1593513/219504192-54cc0753-ff97-4a37-ad4a-8ae915181325.png) ## After ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1593513/219504251-589a7e11-1e7b-4b7b-879d-1b564080017c.png)
…, r=compiler-errors Use span of semicolon for eager recovery in expression Instead of the span of the token after the semicolon. This will hopefully cause fewer errors from overlapping spans. fixes rust-lang#108242 based on rust-lang#108239
rustc_middle: Remove trait `DefIdTree` This trait was a way to generalize over both `TyCtxt` and `Resolver`, but now `Resolver` has access to `TyCtxt`, so this trait is no longer necessary.
…tion-fuel, r=WaffleLapkin Lazily compute crate name for consider_optimizing The extra query is unnecessary in the common case of not having fuel.
…r-errors Recover from for-else and while-else This recovers from attempts at writing for-else or while-else loops, which might help users coming from e.g. Python. ```rs for _ in 0..0 { // ... } else { // ... } ``` Combined with trying to store it in a let binding, the current diagnostic can be a bit confusing. It mentions let-else and suggests wrapping the loop in parentheses, which the user probably doesn't want. let-else doesn't make sense for `for` and `while` loops, as they are of type `()` (which already is an irrefutable pattern and doesn't need let-else). <details> <summary>Current diagnostic</summary> ```rs error: right curly brace `}` before `else` in a `let...else` statement not allowed --> src/main.rs:4:5 | 4 | } else { | ^ | help: wrap the expression in parentheses | 2 ~ let _x = (for _ in 0..0 { 3 | 4 ~ }) else { | ``` </details> Some questions: - Can the wording for the error message be improved? Would "for...else loops are not allowed" fit better? - Should we be more "conservative" in case we want to support this in the future (i.e. say "for...else loops are **currently** not allowed/supported")? - Is there a better way than storing a `&'static str` for the loop type? It is used for substituting the placeholder in the locale file (since it can emit either `for...else` or `while...else`). Maybe there is an enum I could use that I couldn't find
Add `CastKind::Transmute` to MIR ~~Nothing actually produces it in this commit, so I don't know how to test it, but it also means it shouldn't be possible for it to break anything.~~ Includes lowering `transmute` calls to it, so it's used. Zulip Conversation: <https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/189540-t-compiler.2Fwg-mir-opt/topic/Good.20first.20isssue/near/321849610>
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
T-libs
Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
T-rustdoc
Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
labels
Mar 1, 2023
@bors r+ rollup=never p=7 |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Mar 1, 2023
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
T-libs
Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
T-rustdoc
Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
Option::as_
(mut_
)slice
#105871 (AddOption::as_
(mut_
)slice
)!
#108143 (rustdoc: search by macro when query ends with!
)DefIdTree
#108351 (rustc_middle: Remove traitDefIdTree
)CastKind::Transmute
to MIR #108442 (AddCastKind::Transmute
to MIR)Failed merges:
r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup