Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 9 pull requests #107919

Merged
merged 18 commits into from
Feb 11, 2023
Merged

Rollup of 9 pull requests #107919

merged 18 commits into from
Feb 11, 2023

Conversation

Dylan-DPC
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

sdroege and others added 18 commits December 23, 2022 09:34
Some C commandline parsers (e.g. GLib and Qt) are replacing already
handled arguments in `argv` with `NULL` and move them to the end. That
means that `argc` might be bigger than the actual number of non-`NULL`
pointers in `argv` at this point.

To handle this we simply stop iterating at the first `NULL` argument.

`argv` is also guaranteed to be `NULL`-terminated so any non-`NULL`
arguments after the first `NULL` can safely be ignored.

Fixes rust-lang#105999
Makes sure the full header is correctly initialized, including reserve parameters.
…w, r=cjgillot

Add parentheses properly for borrowing suggestion

Fixes rust-lang#104961
… r=ChrisDenton

Stop at the first `NULL` argument when iterating `argv`

Some C commandline parsers (e.g. GLib and Qt) are replacing already handled arguments in `argv` with `NULL` and move them to the end. That means that `argc` might be bigger than the actual number of non-`NULL` pointers in `argv` at this point.

To handle this we simply stop iterating at the first `NULL` argument.

`argv` is also guaranteed to be `NULL`-terminated so any non-`NULL` arguments after the first `NULL` can safely be ignored.

Fixes rust-lang#105999
…ll, r=lcnr

Suggest function call on pattern type mismatch

Fixes rust-lang#101208

This could definitely be generalized to support more suggestions in pattern matches. We can't use all of [`FnCtxt::emit_type_mismatch_suggestions`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_hir_typeck/fn_ctxt/struct.FnCtxt.html#method.emit_type_mismatch_suggestions), but it's on my to-do list to play around with more suggestions that would be productive in this position.
…tests, r=lcnr

Add a couple random projection tests for new solver

Self-explanatory, they're just some cases that have been on my mind in the past (especially `tests/ui/traits/new-solver/param-candidate-doesnt-shadow-project.rs`).
…tions, r=oli-obk

Add ui test for implementation on projection

The error in full can be seen in rust-lang#107263 and is part of why the PR is blocked (it still requires the approval from the team for supporting it).

r? ``@oli-obk``
…s, r=scottmcm

Clarify `new_size` for realloc means bytes

Minor docs fix requested by rust-lang#107875
Zero the `REPARSE_MOUNTPOINT_DATA_BUFFER` header

Makes sure the full header is correctly initialized.

Fixes rust-lang#107884
@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Feb 11, 2023
@Dylan-DPC
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=5

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 11, 2023

📌 Commit a50c379 has been approved by Dylan-DPC

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Feb 11, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 11, 2023

⌛ Testing commit a50c379 with merge 71f6675...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 11, 2023

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: Dylan-DPC
Pushing 71f6675 to master...

1 similar comment
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 11, 2023

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: Dylan-DPC
Pushing 71f6675 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Feb 11, 2023
@bors bors merged commit 71f6675 into rust-lang:master Feb 11, 2023
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:

PR# Perf Build Sha

previous master: 71f6675de1

In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: @rust-timer build $SHA

@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.69.0 milestone Feb 11, 2023
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (71f6675): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-0.4% [-0.4%, -0.3%] 5
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
3.0% [2.3%, 3.8%] 7
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
2.5% [0.8%, 4.0%] 46
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) 3.0% [2.3%, 3.8%] 7

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.