Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix the stability attributes for std::os::fd. #106867

Merged

Conversation

sunfishcode
Copy link
Member

As @bjorn3 pointed out here, I used the wrong stability attribute in #98368 when making std::os::fd public. I set it to Rust 1.63, which was when io-safety was stabilized, but it should be Rust 1.66, which was when std::os::fd was stabilized.

As @bjorn3 pointed out [here], I used the wrong stability attribute in rust-lang#98368
when making `std::os::fd` public. I set it to Rust 1.63, which was when
io-safety was stabilized, but it should be Rust 1.66, which was when
`std::os::fd` was stabilized.

[here]: rust-lang#98368 (comment)
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jan 14, 2023

r? @m-ou-se

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jan 14, 2023
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jan 14, 2023

Hey! It looks like you've submitted a new PR for the library teams!

If this PR contains changes to any rust-lang/rust public library APIs then please comment with @rustbot label +T-libs-api -T-libs to tag it appropriately. If this PR contains changes to any unstable APIs please edit the PR description to add a link to the relevant API Change Proposal or create one if you haven't already. If you're unsure where your change falls no worries, just leave it as is and the reviewer will take a look and make a decision to forward on if necessary.

Examples of T-libs-api changes:

  • Stabilizing library features
  • Introducing insta-stable changes such as new implementations of existing stable traits on existing stable types
  • Introducing new or changing existing unstable library APIs (excluding permanently unstable features / features without a tracking issue)
  • Changing public documentation in ways that create new stability guarantees
  • Changing observable runtime behavior of library APIs

@m-ou-se
Copy link
Member

m-ou-se commented Jan 14, 2023

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 14, 2023

📌 Commit 287c658 has been approved by m-ou-se

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jan 14, 2023
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 15, 2023
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#106072 (fix: misleading "add dyn keyword before derive macro" suggestion)
 - rust-lang#106859 (Suggestion for type mismatch when we need a u8 but the programmer wrote a char literal)
 - rust-lang#106863 (Remove various double spaces in compiler source comments.)
 - rust-lang#106865 (Add explanation comment for GUI test)
 - rust-lang#106867 (Fix the stability attributes for `std::os::fd`.)
 - rust-lang#106878 (Add regression test for rust-lang#92157)
 - rust-lang#106879 (Add regression test for rust-lang#42114)
 - rust-lang#106880 (doc: fix typo)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 445e384 into rust-lang:master Jan 15, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.68.0 milestone Jan 15, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants