Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

stop special-casing 'static in evaluation #102472

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 28, 2023
Merged

Conversation

lcnr
Copy link
Contributor

@lcnr lcnr commented Sep 29, 2022

fixes #102360

I have no idea whether this actually removed all places where 'static matters. Without canonicalization it's very easy to accidentally rely on 'static again. Blocked on changing the order_dependent_trait_objects future-compat lint to a hard error

r? @nikomatsakis

@lcnr lcnr added the S-blocked Status: Marked as blocked ❌ on something else such as an RFC or other implementation work. label Sep 29, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added the T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Sep 29, 2022
@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Sep 29, 2022
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

notriddle added a commit to notriddle/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 21, 2022
…, r=jackh726

make `order_dependent_trait_objects` show up in future-breakage reports

tried to change it to a hard error in rust-lang#102474 but breaking the more than 1000 dependents of `traitobject` doesn't feel great 😅

This lint has existed since more than 3 years now and the way this is currently implemented is buggy and will break with rust-lang#102472. imo we should upgrade it to also report for dependencies and maybe also backport this to beta. Then after maybe 2-3 stable versions I would like to finally convert this lint to a hard error.
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 21, 2022
…, r=jackh726

make `order_dependent_trait_objects` show up in future-breakage reports

tried to change it to a hard error in rust-lang#102474 but breaking the more than 1000 dependents of `traitobject` doesn't feel great 😅

This lint has existed since more than 3 years now and the way this is currently implemented is buggy and will break with rust-lang#102472. imo we should upgrade it to also report for dependencies and maybe also backport this to beta. Then after maybe 2-3 stable versions I would like to finally convert this lint to a hard error.
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 22, 2022

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #103375) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@lcnr lcnr marked this pull request as ready for review November 8, 2022 14:24
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 23, 2022

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #104758) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@pnkfelix
Copy link
Member

@rustbot label: -T-compiler +T-types

@rustbot rustbot added T-types Relevant to the types team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. and removed T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Dec 15, 2022
@pnkfelix
Copy link
Member

pnkfelix commented Dec 15, 2022

@rustbot assign @jackh726

(whoops I guess that should have been a r?)

@rustbot rustbot assigned jackh726 and unassigned nikomatsakis Dec 15, 2022
@jackh726
Copy link
Member

@lcnr what's the status of this?

@jackh726 jackh726 removed the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Feb 18, 2023
@jackh726
Copy link
Member

jackh726 commented Mar 8, 2023

Given this only changes unstable marker trait behavior, fine to land with open issue referenced in known bug

@lcnr
Copy link
Contributor Author

lcnr commented Mar 22, 2023

opened #109481 for overlapping-impl-1-modulo-regions.rs and we already have #89515 for the other test.

r? @jackh726

@rustbot ready

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Mar 22, 2023

Could not assign reviewer from: jackh726.
User(s) jackh726 are either the PR author or are already assigned, and there are no other candidates.
Use r? to specify someone else to assign.

@rustbot rustbot removed the S-blocked Status: Marked as blocked ❌ on something else such as an RFC or other implementation work. label Mar 22, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Mar 22, 2023
@jackh726
Copy link
Member

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 28, 2023

📌 Commit 73c79cd has been approved by jackh726

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Mar 28, 2023
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 28, 2023
Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#91793 (socket ancillary data implementation for FreeBSD (from 13 and above).)
 - rust-lang#92284 (Change advance(_back)_by to return the remainder instead of the number of processed elements)
 - rust-lang#102472 (stop special-casing `'static` in evaluation)
 - rust-lang#108480 (Use Rayon's TLV directly)
 - rust-lang#109321 (Erase impl regions when checking for impossible to eagerly monomorphize items)
 - rust-lang#109470 (Correctly substitute GAT's type used in `normalize_param_env` in `check_type_bounds`)
 - rust-lang#109562 (Update ar_archive_writer to 0.1.3)
 - rust-lang#109629 (remove obsolete `givens` from regionck)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 4bd33fd into rust-lang:master Mar 28, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.70.0 milestone Mar 28, 2023
@lcnr lcnr deleted the static-in-eval branch March 28, 2023 19:35
@lqd
Copy link
Member

lqd commented Mar 31, 2023

For triage purposes: from the results in the rollup where this PR landed, and the results in a revert.

@rustbot label: +perf-regression

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
perf-regression Performance regression. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-types Relevant to the types team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

broken interaction between marker traits, lifetimes, and caching
9 participants