-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Teach typechecker that uint is <plusable>. #88
Labels
A-type-system
Area: Type system
E-easy
Call for participation: Easy difficulty. Experience needed to fix: Not much. Good first issue.
Comments
Teach the typechecker that uints are integral types. Closed by 66d313d. |
oli-obk
pushed a commit
to oli-obk/rust
that referenced
this issue
Jul 19, 2017
don't freeze globals twice
keeperofdakeys
pushed a commit
to keeperofdakeys/rust
that referenced
this issue
Dec 12, 2017
Update the android CI image
kazcw
pushed a commit
to kazcw/rust
that referenced
this issue
Oct 23, 2018
* Add _mm_sfence * Add _mm_getcsr/_mm_setcsr and convenience wrappers * Use test::black_box to simplify tests * Use uppercase naming for C-macro equivalents Discussed at rust-lang/stdarch#84
dlrobertson
pushed a commit
to dlrobertson/rust
that referenced
this issue
Nov 29, 2018
Added attributes grammar
eddyb
pushed a commit
to eddyb/rust
that referenced
this issue
Jun 30, 2020
Port to the 2018 edition and cargo-semver cleanups
djtech-dev
pushed a commit
to djtech-dev/rust
that referenced
this issue
Dec 9, 2021
Derive Clone, Copy, and Hash for BasicBlock
celinval
pushed a commit
to celinval/rust-dev
that referenced
this issue
Jun 4, 2024
…ng#88) * Complete and replace the unsized pointer cast implementation * Respond to code review of unsized pointer cast implementation Co-authored-by: Mark R. Tuttle <[email protected]>
jaisnan
pushed a commit
to jaisnan/rust-dev
that referenced
this issue
Oct 15, 2024
…d` (rust-lang#88) Towards model-checking#53 ### Changes - added contract and harness for `non_null::new` - added contract and harness for `non_null::new_unchecked` The difference between the two APIs is that `non_null::new` can handle null pointers while `non_null::new_unchecked` does not. Therefore the contract for `non_null::new` does not require a `nonnull` pointer. ### Re-validation To re-validate the verification results, run `kani verify-std -Z unstable-options "path/to/library" -Z function-contracts -Z mem-predicates --harness ptr::non_null::verify::non_null_check_new`. This will run both harnesses. All default checks should pass. --------- Co-authored-by: OwO <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Zyad Hassan <[email protected]>
This issue was closed.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
A-type-system
Area: Type system
E-easy
Call for participation: Easy difficulty. Experience needed to fix: Not much. Good first issue.
At the moment,
fails to compile, giving the error:
Fix this.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: