-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
dead-code optimize if const { expr }
even in opt-level=0
#85836
Comments
Well, turns out this already works for simple constants in MIR! 🎉 However, the place I actually needed it was more like |
This should be done by SimplifyBranches which AFAIK is run unconditionally. I wonder if its match needs to be expanded? Is there mcve? |
The problem is that this can't be done on generic constants, as we don't mir-optimize post-monomorphization. We could start doing some benchmarks to see how bad running all mir opts (or at least a select few) would be if we duplicated, substituted and optimized MIR bodies for concrete generic parameters. |
I would say trait SizeBiggerFour: Sized {
const VALUE: bool = std::mem::size_of::<Self>() > 4;
}
impl<T> SizeBiggerFour for T {}
pub fn foo<T>() -> i32 { if <T as SizeBiggerFour>::VALUE { 3 } else { 5 } }
pub fn bar() -> i32 { foo::<isize>() } qualifies as an MCVE as the monomorphized ; playground::foo
; Function Attrs: nonlazybind uwtable
define i32 @_ZN10playground3foo17hb9992b01cb0c258eE() unnamed_addr #0 !dbg !6 {
start:
%0 = alloca i32, align 4
br i1 true, label %bb1, label %bb2, !dbg !15
bb2: ; preds = %start
store i32 5, i32* %0, align 4, !dbg !16
br label %bb3, !dbg !15
bb1: ; preds = %start
store i32 3, i32* %0, align 4, !dbg !17
br label %bb3, !dbg !15
bb3: ; preds = %bb2, %bb1
%1 = load i32, i32* %0, align 4, !dbg !18
ret i32 %1, !dbg !18
} |
Maybe it should also be evaluated together with polymorphization or const_evaluatable_checked since those can cut down on the duplication before applying further optimizations. |
Bonus points if this can avoid monomorphizing functions called in the dead code too. Demo extracted from Would be great to not codegen all the downstream stuff that's only called in the else block of a |
FYI this should work with #96557 |
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
…=thomcc Make ZST checks in core/alloc more readable There's a bunch of these checks because of special handing for ZSTs in various unsafe implementations of stuff. This lets them be `T::IS_ZST` instead of `mem::size_of::<T>() == 0` every time, making them both more readable and more terse. *Not* proposed for stabilization. Would be `pub(crate)` except `alloc` wants to use it too. (And while it doesn't matter now, if we ever get something like rust-lang#85836 making it a const can help codegen be simpler.)
This seems closely related to rust-lang/rfcs#3582 and #122301. |
@saethlin's recent PR #121421 seems related here? If the However, if that dead code calls functions, those still get codegen'd as usual -- the collector that determines which function to codegen doesn't know about dead branches. We'd have to embed a (simple) monomorphization-time reachability analysis in the collector to fix that. |
…try> Only collect mono items from reachable blocks Fixes the wrong commented pointed out in: rust-lang#121421 (comment) Moves the analysis to use the worklist strategy: rust-lang#121421 (comment) Also fixes rust-lang#85836, using the same reachability analysis
…try> Only collect mono items from reachable blocks Fixes the wrong commented pointed out in: rust-lang#121421 (comment) Moves the analysis to use the worklist strategy: rust-lang#121421 (comment) Also fixes rust-lang#85836, using the same reachability analysis
…try> Only collect mono items from reachable blocks Fixes the wrong commented pointed out in: rust-lang#121421 (comment) Moves the analysis to use the worklist strategy: rust-lang#121421 (comment) Also fixes rust-lang#85836, using the same reachability analysis
…try> Only collect mono items from reachable blocks Fixes the wrong commented pointed out in: rust-lang#121421 (comment) Moves the analysis to use the worklist strategy: rust-lang#121421 (comment) Also fixes rust-lang#85836, using the same reachability analysis
…try> Only collect mono items from reachable blocks Fixes the wrong commented pointed out in: rust-lang#121421 (comment) Moves the analysis to use the worklist strategy: rust-lang#121421 (comment) Also fixes rust-lang#85836, using the same reachability analysis
…try> Only collect mono items from reachable blocks Fixes the wrong commented pointed out in: rust-lang#121421 (comment) Moves the analysis to use the worklist strategy: rust-lang#121421 (comment) Also fixes rust-lang#85836, using the same reachability analysis
…jgillot Only collect mono items from reachable blocks Fixes the wrong comment pointed out in: rust-lang#121421 (comment) Moves the analysis to use the worklist strategy: rust-lang#121421 (comment) Also fixes rust-lang#85836, using the same reachability analysis
inline_const
tracking issue: #76001Inspired by @oli-obk's comment in #85828 (comment)
For things like
if const { expr } { 0 } else { do something complex }
it'd be nice to not have to even give LLVM the code for the else branch to have to emit. Ought to save time and binary size.Tentatively marked mir-opt, since we presumably still need to make the MIR for it, in order to borrow-check and such the unreachable code. But might need to be codegen-time instead to pick up on monomorphized inline constants.
Hopefully should be doable relatively easily when the const is an inline const, since that forces const folding already, and thus there should just be a
const true
in the MIR.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: