compiler stack overflow compiling run-pass/issues/issue-29466.rs and run-pass/issues/issue-36792.rs with debuginfo #58463
Labels
A-debuginfo
Area: Debugging information in compiled programs (DWARF, PDB, etc.)
C-bug
Category: This is a bug.
I-crash
Issue: The compiler crashes (SIGSEGV, SIGABRT, etc). Use I-ICE instead when the compiler panics.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Comments
|
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/run-pass/issues/issue-36792.rs When compiling it on the playground @ stable: |
|
Interesting enough #36792 and #47344 never fixed that? Well, it doesn't ICE anymore, but I would like to see a proper error message cc @topecongiro because you dealt with that bug earlier on. |
jonas-schievink
added
I-crash
Aaron1011
added a commit
to Aaron1011/rust
that referenced
this issue
Mar 26, 2019
By using 'impl trait', it's possible to create a self-referential
type as follows:
fn foo() -> impl Copy { foo }
This is a function which returns itself.
Normally, the signature of this function would be impossible
to write - it would look like 'fn foo() -> fn() -> fn() ...'
e.g. a function which returns a function, which returns a function...
Using 'impl trait' allows us to avoid writing this infinitely long
type. While it's useless for practical purposes, it does compile and run
However, issues arise when we try to generate llvm debuginfo for such a
type. All 'impl trait' types (e.g. ty::Opaque) are resolved when we
generate debuginfo, which can lead to us recursing back to the original
'fn' type when we try to process its return type.
To resolve this, I've modified debuginfo generation to account for these
kinds of weird types. Unfortunately, there's no 'correct' debuginfo that
we can generate - 'impl trait' does not exist in debuginfo, and this
kind of recursive type is impossible to directly represent.
To ensure that we emit *something*, this commit emits dummy
debuginfo/type names whenever it encounters a self-reference. In
practice, this should never happen - it's just to ensure that we can
emit some kind of debuginfo, even if it's not particularly meaningful
Fixes rust-lang#58463
Centril
added a commit
to Centril/rust
that referenced
this issue
Mar 29, 2019
…=oli-obk
Fix stack overflow when generating debuginfo for 'recursive' type
By using 'impl trait', it's possible to create a self-referential
type as follows:
fn foo() -> impl Copy { foo }
This is a function which returns itself.
Normally, the signature of this function would be impossible
to write - it would look like 'fn foo() -> fn() -> fn() ...'
e.g. a function which returns a function, which returns a function...
Using 'impl trait' allows us to avoid writing this infinitely long
type. While it's useless for practical purposes, it does compile and run
However, issues arise when we try to generate llvm debuginfo for such a
type. All 'impl trait' types (e.g. ty::Opaque) are resolved when we
generate debuginfo, which can lead to us recursing back to the original
'fn' type when we try to process its return type.
To resolve this, I've modified debuginfo generation to account for these
kinds of weird types. Unfortunately, there's no 'correct' debuginfo that
we can generate - 'impl trait' does not exist in debuginfo, and this
kind of recursive type is impossible to directly represent.
To ensure that we emit *something*, this commit emits dummy
debuginfo/type names whenever it encounters a self-reference. In
practice, this should never happen - it's just to ensure that we can
emit some kind of debuginfo, even if it's not particularly meaningful
Fixes rust-lang#58463
Aaron1011
added a commit
to Aaron1011/rust
that referenced
this issue
Apr 1, 2019
By using 'impl trait', it's possible to create a self-referential
type as follows:
fn foo() -> impl Copy { foo }
This is a function which returns itself.
Normally, the signature of this function would be impossible
to write - it would look like 'fn foo() -> fn() -> fn() ...'
e.g. a function which returns a function, which returns a function...
Using 'impl trait' allows us to avoid writing this infinitely long
type. While it's useless for practical purposes, it does compile and run
However, issues arise when we try to generate llvm debuginfo for such a
type. All 'impl trait' types (e.g. ty::Opaque) are resolved when we
generate debuginfo, which can lead to us recursing back to the original
'fn' type when we try to process its return type.
To resolve this, I've modified debuginfo generation to account for these
kinds of weird types. Unfortunately, there's no 'correct' debuginfo that
we can generate - 'impl trait' does not exist in debuginfo, and this
kind of recursive type is impossible to directly represent.
To ensure that we emit *something*, this commit emits dummy
debuginfo/type names whenever it encounters a self-reference. In
practice, this should never happen - it's just to ensure that we can
emit some kind of debuginfo, even if it's not particularly meaningful
Fixes rust-lang#58463
Centril
added a commit
to Centril/rust
that referenced
this issue
Apr 2, 2019
…=oli-obk
Fix stack overflow when generating debuginfo for 'recursive' type
By using 'impl trait', it's possible to create a self-referential
type as follows:
fn foo() -> impl Copy { foo }
This is a function which returns itself.
Normally, the signature of this function would be impossible
to write - it would look like 'fn foo() -> fn() -> fn() ...'
e.g. a function which returns a function, which returns a function...
Using 'impl trait' allows us to avoid writing this infinitely long
type. While it's useless for practical purposes, it does compile and run
However, issues arise when we try to generate llvm debuginfo for such a
type. All 'impl trait' types (e.g. ty::Opaque) are resolved when we
generate debuginfo, which can lead to us recursing back to the original
'fn' type when we try to process its return type.
To resolve this, I've modified debuginfo generation to account for these
kinds of weird types. Unfortunately, there's no 'correct' debuginfo that
we can generate - 'impl trait' does not exist in debuginfo, and this
kind of recursive type is impossible to directly represent.
To ensure that we emit *something*, this commit emits dummy
debuginfo/type names whenever it encounters a self-reference. In
practice, this should never happen - it's just to ensure that we can
emit some kind of debuginfo, even if it's not particularly meaningful
Fixes rust-lang#58463
Centril
added a commit
to Centril/rust
that referenced
this issue
Apr 2, 2019
…=oli-obk
Fix stack overflow when generating debuginfo for 'recursive' type
By using 'impl trait', it's possible to create a self-referential
type as follows:
fn foo() -> impl Copy { foo }
This is a function which returns itself.
Normally, the signature of this function would be impossible
to write - it would look like 'fn foo() -> fn() -> fn() ...'
e.g. a function which returns a function, which returns a function...
Using 'impl trait' allows us to avoid writing this infinitely long
type. While it's useless for practical purposes, it does compile and run
However, issues arise when we try to generate llvm debuginfo for such a
type. All 'impl trait' types (e.g. ty::Opaque) are resolved when we
generate debuginfo, which can lead to us recursing back to the original
'fn' type when we try to process its return type.
To resolve this, I've modified debuginfo generation to account for these
kinds of weird types. Unfortunately, there's no 'correct' debuginfo that
we can generate - 'impl trait' does not exist in debuginfo, and this
kind of recursive type is impossible to directly represent.
To ensure that we emit *something*, this commit emits dummy
debuginfo/type names whenever it encounters a self-reference. In
practice, this should never happen - it's just to ensure that we can
emit some kind of debuginfo, even if it's not particularly meaningful
Fixes rust-lang#58463
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
With
debuginfo-testsset to true in config.toml, runningpython x.py test src/test/run-passfails with:The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: